Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (70)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephenson, M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, W.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephenson, M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, W.P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 2, 446-451, February 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case–control study

M.D. Stephenson1,3,4,5, K.A. Awartani1 and W.P. Robinson2,3

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and 2 Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, 3 British Columbia's Research Institute for Children's & Women's Health and 4 British Columbia's Women's Hospital & Health Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada

BACKGROUND: Reproductive loss carries immeasurable human costs as well as being costly to the health care system. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency and distribution of cytogenetically abnormal miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage and to compare the results with the general population. METHODS: A total of 420 specimens, including 29 pre-clinical, 237 embryonic and 154 fetal, were successfully karyotyped from 285 couples with recurrent miscarriage. The results were stratified according to maternal age and compared with controls. RESULTS: In all, 225 specimens (54%) were euploid. A total of 195 specimens (46%) were cytogenetically abnormal, of which 131 (66.5%) were trisomic, 37 (19%) were polyploid, 18 (9%) were monosomy X, eight (4%) were unbalanced translocations and one was a combination of trisomy 21 and monosomy X. The frequency of euploid miscarriages was significantly higher in women <36 years of age with recurrent miscarriage compared with controls. The distribution of cytogenetic abnormalities in the recurrent miscarriage group was not significantly different from controls, when stratified by maternal age. CONCLUSIONS: Women <36 years of age with recurrent miscarriage have a higher frequency of euploid miscarriage. When stratified for maternal age, there is no difference in the distribution of cytogenetically abnormal miscarriages in couples with recurrent miscarriage compared with controls.

Key words: aneuploid/chromosomes/cytogenetic analysis/recurrent miscarriage/spontaneous abortion

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Women's Health Centre, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6H 3N1. E-mail: mstephenson{at}cw.bc.ca

Submitted on June 15, 2001; resubmitted on September 10, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Fragouli, M. Lenzi, R. Ross, M. Katz-Jaffe, W.B. Schoolcraft, and D. Wells
Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2596 - 2608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Genetic aspects of female reproduction
Hum. Reprod. Update, April 2, 2008; (2008) dmn009v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
G. B. Wortzman-Show, M. Kurokawa, R. A. Fissore, and J. P. Evans
Calcium and sperm components in the establishment of the membrane block to polyspermy: studies of ICSI and activation with sperm factor
Mol. Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 13(8): 557 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Jauniaux, R. G. Farquharson, O. B. Christiansen, N. Exalto, and On behalf of ESHRE Special Interest Group for Earl
Evidence-based guidelines for the investigation and medical treatment of recurrent miscarriage
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2216 - 2222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. D. Stephenson and S. Sierra
Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1076 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Kaare, J. N. Painter, V.-M. Ulander, R. Kaaja, and K. Aittomaki
Variations of the Amnionless gene in recurrent spontaneous abortions
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 12(1): 25 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. G. Farquharson, E. Jauniaux, N. Exalto, and on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for
Updated and revised nomenclature for description of early pregnancy events
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3008 - 3011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sugiura-Ogasawara, Y. Ozaki, S.-i. Sonta, T. Makino, and K. Suzumori
Exposure to bisphenol A is associated with recurrent miscarriage
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2325 - 2329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. T M Franssen, J. C Korevaar, N. J Leschot, P. M M Bossuyt, A. C Knegt, K. B J Gerssen-Schoorl, C. H Wouters, K. B M Hansson, R. Hochstenbach, K. Madan, et al.
Selective chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: case-control study
BMJ, July 16, 2005; 331(7509): 137 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Diego-Alvarez, M. Garcia-Hoyos, M. J. Trujillo, C. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, M. Rodriguez de Alba, C. Ayuso, C. Ramos-Corrales, and I. Lorda-Sanchez
Application of quantitative fluorescent PCR with short tandem repeat markers to the study of aneuploidies in spontaneous miscarriages
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1235 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
S. G. Vorsanova, A. D. Kolotii, I. Y. Iourov, V. V. Monakhov, E. A. Kirillova, I. V. Soloviev, and Y. B. Yurov
Evidence for High Frequency of Chromosomal Mosaicism in Spontaneous Abortions Revealed by Interphase FISH Analysis
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2005; 53(3): 375 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
G. B. Wortzman and J. P. Evans
Membrane and cortical abnormalities in post-ovulatory aged eggs: analysis of fertilizability and establishment of the membrane block to polyspermy
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 1 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
L. Wilton
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 33 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Goddijn, J.H.K. Joosten, A.C. Knegt, F. van derVeen, M.T.M. Franssen, G.J. Bonsel, and N.J. Leschot
Clinical relevance of diagnosing structural chromosome abnormalities in couples with repeated miscarriage
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 1013 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Quenby, G. Vince, R. Farquharson, and J. Aplin
Recurrent miscarriage: a defect in nature's quality control?
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1959 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.