Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Land, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bruggeman, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Land, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bruggeman, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 3, 525-527, March 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Chlamydia trachomatis in subfertile women undergoing uterine instrumentation

Screen or treat?*

Jolande A. Land1,3, Anna P. Gijsen1, Johannes L.H. Evers1 and Cathrien A. Bruggeman2

1 Research Institute Growth and Development (GROW), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and 2 Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Women who undergo uterine instrumentation are considered at risk for pelvic infections by Chlamydia trachomatis, which may derive either from ascending endocervical infections or from reactivation of micro-organisms persisting in the genital tract after previous chlamydia infections. Women presenting at fertility clinics frequently undergo uterine instrumentation (e.g. hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy with hydrotubation). Studies in subfertile women using DNA amplification techniques have shown that the prevalence of endocervical chlamydia infections is low (1.8%). In contrast, in 30–60% of subfertile women chlamydia IgG antibodies can be found in serum, indicating previous chlamydia infections. It has been demonstrated that, several years after chlamydia infections, viable micro-organisms may still be present in the upper genital tract. Therefore, subfertile women with chlamydia antibodies should be considered at risk for reactivation of persistent chlamydia infections after uterine instrumentation, even after exclusion of endocervical chlamydia infections. Moreover, in subfertile women without chlamydia antibodies, the presence of viable micro-organisms in the genital tract cannot be excluded. As a consequence, prophylactic antibiotics before uterine instrumentation should be considered in all subfertile women, instead of endocervical screening for C. trachomatis and treatment of positive cases only.

Key words: Chlamydia trachomatis/prophylactic antibiotics/screening/subfertility/uterine instrumentation

3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail: jlan{at}sgyn.azm.nl.

* Part of this work has been presented at the IVth European Chlamydia Congress (August 20-23, 2000) in Helsinki, Finland.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Idahl, J. Boman, U. Kumlin, and J.I. Olofsson
Demonstration of Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibodies in the male partner of the infertile couple is correlated with a reduced likelihood of achieving pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1121 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Hung, Y. Ng, C. S. W. Ngai, and P. C. Ho
Chlamydia trachomatis in infertile women undergoing uterine instrumentation: Screen or treat
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2215 - 2216.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Macmillan
Chlamydia trachomatis in subfertile women undergoing uterine instrumentation: The clinician's role
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1433 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.