Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, M.G.
Right arrow Articles by Cram, D.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katz, M.G.
Right arrow Articles by Cram, D.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 3, 752-759, March 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

DNA fingerprinting of sister blastomeres from human IVF embryos

M.G. Katz1,2,3, A.O. Trounson1 and D.S. Cram1,2

1 Centre for Early Human Development, Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria and 2 Monash IVF, Melbourne, Australia

BACKGROUND: Previously published single cell DNA fingerprinting systems have been plagued by high rates of allele drop-out (ADO) and preferential amplification (PA) preventing clinical application in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. METHODS: Tetranucleotide microsatellite markers with high heterozygosity, known allelic size ranges and minimal PCR stutter artefacts were selected for chromosomes X, 13, 18 and 21 and optimized in a multiplex fluorescent (FL)-PCR format. FL-PCR products were analysed using the ABI Prism 377 DNA sequenator and Genescan software. Validation of the DNA fingerprinting system was performed on single diploid (n = 50) and aneuploid (n = 25) buccal cells and embryonic blastomeres (n = 21). RESULTS: The optimized pentaplex PCR DNA fingerprinting system displayed a high proportion of successful amplifications (>91%) and low ADO and PA (<6%) when assessed on 50 human buccal cells. DNA fingerprints of single cells from a subject with Down's syndrome detected the expected tri-allelic pattern for the chromosome 21 marker, confirming trisomy 21. In a blind study on 21 single blastomeres, all embryos were identifiable by their unique DNA fingerprints and shared parental alleles. CONCLUSIONS: A highly specific multiplex FL-PCR based on the amplification of five highly polymorphic microsatellite markers was developed for single cells. This finding paves the way for the development of a more complex PCR DNA fingerprinting system to assess aneuploidy and single gene mutations in IVF embryos from couples at genetic risk.

Key words: aneuploidy/DNA fingerprinting/embryonic blastomeres/single cell PCR

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre for Early Human Development, Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Level 3, 27–31 Wright St, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia. E-mail: mandy.katz{at}med.monash.edu.au

Submitted on August 24, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Jones, D. Cram, and On behalf of all authors
Reply: Novel strategy with potential to identify developmentally competent IVF blastocysts
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2872 - 2873.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. M. Jones, D. S. Cram, B. Song, G. Kokkali, K. Pantos, and A. O. Trounson
Novel strategy with potential to identify developmentally competent IVF blastocysts
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1748 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.