Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 3, 830-840,
March 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence
1 Family and Child Psychology Research Centre, City University, London, UK, 2 Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands, 3 University of Milan, Italy, 4 Institut Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain and 5 Goldsmiths College, University of London, UK
BACKGROUND: Findings are presented of the second phase of a European longitudinal study of families created by assisted reproduction. The present investigation reports on data obtained during the child's transition to adolescence. METHODS: A total of 102 IVF families, 94 donor insemination (DI) families, 102 adoptive families, and 102 families with a naturally conceived child were compared on standardized interview and questionnaire measures of parenting and children's psychological well-being. RESULTS: The assisted reproduction families were similar to the adoptive and natural conception families for many of the measures of the quality of parentchild relationships. To the extent that differences were found between the assisted reproduction families and the other family types, these reflected mainly more positive functioning among the assisted reproduction families, with the possible exception of the overinvolvement with their children of a small proportion of assisted reproduction mothers and fathers. The assisted reproduction children were functioning well and did not differ from the adoptive or naturally conceived children on any of the measures of psychological adjustment. However, only 8.6% had been told about their genetic origins. CONCLUSIONS: IVF and DI families with an early adolescent child appear to be functioning well.
Key words: adolescence/child development/donor insemination/IVF/parenting
6 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.e.golombok{at}city.ac.uk
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. H. Shelton, J. Boivin, D. Hay, M. B.M. van den Bree, F. J. Rice, G. T. Harold, and A. Thapar Examining differences in psychological adjustment problems among children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies International Journal of Behavioral Development, September 1, 2009; 33(5): 385 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hvidtjorn, L. Schieve, D. Schendel, B. Jacobsson, C. Svaerke, and P. Thorsen Cerebral Palsy, Autism Spectrum Disorders, and Developmental Delay in Children Born After Assisted Conception: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2009; 163(1): 72 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Colpin and G. Bossaert Adolescents conceived by IVF: parenting and psychosocial adjustment Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2724 - 2730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.J. Middelburg, M.J. Heineman, A.F. Bos, and M. Hadders-Algra Neuromotor, cognitive, language and behavioural outcome in children born following IVF or ICSI-a systematic review Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2008; 14(3): 219 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Siegel, R Dittrich, and J Vollmann Ethical opinions and personal attitudes of young adults conceived by in vitro fertilisation J. Med. Ethics, April 1, 2008; 34(4): 236 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Burr and P Reynolds Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children J. Med. Ethics, April 1, 2008; 34(4): 281 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Knoester, F.M. Helmerhorst, L.A.J. van der Westerlaken, F.J. Walther, S. Veen, and on behalf of the Leiden Artificial Reproductive Te Matched follow-up study of 5 8-year-old ICSI singletons: child behaviour, parenting stress and child (health-related) quality of life Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3098 - 3107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. MacCallum and S. Golombok Embryo donation families: mothers' decisions regarding disclosure of donor conception Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2888 - 2895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Weissenberg, R. Landau, and I. Madgar Older single mothers assisted by sperm donation and their children Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2784 - 2791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Paul and R. Berger Topic avoidance and family functioning in families conceived with donor insemination Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2566 - 2571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kirkman, D. Rosenthal, and L. Johnson Families working it out: adolescents' views on communicating about donor-assisted conception Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2318 - 2324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Larcher The health of children conceived by assisted reproduction technologies Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 668 - 669. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lalos, C. Gottlieb, and O. Lalos Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study of parental thinking Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1759 - 1768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Johnson, T. Hartman, and C. E. Colby Developmental and Genetic Outcomes in Children Conceived Through Assisted Reproductive Technologies NeoReviews, December 1, 2006; 7(12): e615 - e626. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Godman, K. Sanders, M. Rosenberg, and P. Burton Potential sperm donors', recipients' and their partners' opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 3022 - 3026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. van den Akker A review of family donor constructs: Current research and future directions Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2006; 12(2): 91 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L J Fisher-Jeffes, I Banerjee, and A G Sutcliffe Parents' concerns regarding their ART children Reproduction, February 1, 2006; 131(2): 389 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Conrad, G. Schilling, and R. Liedtke Parental coping with sudden infant death after donor insemination: case report Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 1053 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Brewaeys, J.K. de Bruyn, L.A. Louwe, and F.M. Helmerhorst Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients' choices Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 820 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lycett, K. Daniels, R. Curson, and S. Golombok School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents' disclosure patterns Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 810 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rosen Third-Party Reproduction and Adoption in Cancer Patients J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, March 1, 2005; 2005(34): 91 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.E. Scheib, M. Riordan, and S. Rubin Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12-17 year olds Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 239 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, T. Tjus, J. Nekkebroeck, J. Squires, D. Verte, M. Heimann, M. Bonduelle, G. Palermo, U.-B. Wennerholm, and on behalf of the Collaborative study of Brussels, Psychological follow-up study of 5-year-old ICSI children Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2791 - 2797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.S. Svanberg, C. Lampic, T. Bergh, and O. Lundkvist Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Sweden Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1107 - 1114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.E. Scheib, M. Riordan, and S. Rubin Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents' perspective 13-18 years later Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1115 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sydsjo, M. Wadsby, S. Kjellberg, and A. Sydsjo Relationships and parenthood in couples after assisted reproduction and in spontaneous primiparous couples: a prospective long-term follow-up study Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3242 - 3250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||








