Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1023-1030,
April 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Different perspectives of patients and health care professionals on the potential benefits and risks of blastocyst culture and multiple embryo transfer
1 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX and 2 Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
BACKGROUND: A trade-off exists between the risk of multiple pregnancy and prospects of pregnancy itself in assisted reproduction. Blastocyst culture and embryo transfer after ~5 days may be one method of reconciling this dilemma, although a controversial one. METHODS AND RESULTS: We presented a questionnaire to groups of patients, embryologists and clinicians to solicit views on the potential benefits and risks of blastocyst culture and multiple pregnancy. The results indicate that patients are more accepting of multiple pregnancy as a prospective outcome of treatment than those involved in their treatment, despite awareness of the risks. Our data tend to support a genuine difference in values on this point. We also sought views on the patient selection criteria and treatment protocols which should apply in a planned randomized controlled trial comparing blastocyst culture with cleaving embryo transfer (e.g. numbers of embryos to transfer, acceptable levels of risk of twin and triplet pregnancy, the proportion of patients who would be put off from entering the trial by the risk of no embryo transfer). These are presented and discussed with reference to their likely impact on trial recruitment, highlighting differences in perspective between patients and professionals. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there are differences among patients, embryologists and clinicians in their perceptions of the desirability of multiple pregnancy, their preferences in certain practical aspects of treatment such as embryo transfer numbers, and their ideas on blastocyst culture and its prospective outcomes and risks.
Key words: blastocyst/embryo transfer/human/multiple pregnancy/questionnaire
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ghartshorne{at}bio.warwick.ac.uk
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. van Wely, M. Twisk, B.W. Mol, and F. van der Veen Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2736 - 2738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Zikopoulos, W. Verpoest, M. Camus, H. Joris, A.C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey Should we advise patients undergoing IVF to start a cycle leading to a day 3 or a day 5 transfer? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2550 - 2554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, L. Schmidt, and A. N. Andersen Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 621 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|