Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (58)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by di Zerega, G.S.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by di Zerega, G.S.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C.B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1031-1038, April 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

A randomized, controlled pilot study of the safety and efficacy of 4% icodextrin solution in the reduction of adhesions following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery

G.S. di Zerega1, S.J.S. Verco6,7, P. Young2, M. Kettel3, W. Kobak1, D. Martin4, J. Sanfilippo5, E.M. Peers6, A. Scrimgeour6 and C.B. Brown6

1 University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, 2 IGO Medical Group, 3 San Diego Fertility Center, San Diego, CA, 4 Private Practice, Memphis, TN, 5 Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and 6 ML Laboratories PLC, Leicester, UK

BACKGROUND: Adhesion-related readmissions are frequent sequelae to gynaecological surgery. Attempts to prevent adhesions by separating healing peritoneal surfaces include site-specific barriers and hydroflotation by instilled solutions. Rapid absorption limits the effectiveness of solutions such as Ringer's lactated saline (RLS). This pilot study assessed the safety, tolerability and preliminary effectiveness of a non-viscous, iso-osmolar solution of 4% icodextrin, an {alpha}-1,4 glucose polymer with prolonged intraperitoneal residence, in reducing adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. METHODS: Women aged 18 years, requiring laparoscopic adnexal surgery (n = 62), were entered into a randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, multicentre study to compare 4% icodextrin with RLS. Treatments were coded in blocks of four with equal randomization to each group, and pre-allocated to consecutively numbered patients. At least 100 ml per 30 min was used for intra-operative lavage, with 1 l instilled post-operatively. Per protocol analysis included all eligible patients (n = 53); reformation analysis required one or more baseline adhesion (n = 42). Incidence, extent and severity of post-operative adhesions were assessed at second-look laparoscopy after 6–12 weeks. Procedures were video-taped for third party, blinded assessment. RESULTS: Safety and tolerability (laboratory variables, adverse events, clinical follow-up) were good with no difference between treatments. A shift analysis of incidence-ranked adhesions (n = 53) showed apparent improvements in more patients with icodextrin than RLS (37 versus 15%; not significant). Adhesion score reduction (n = 42) was more frequent in icodextrin- than RLS-treated patients: incidence (52 versus 32%), extent (52 versus 47%), and severity (65 versus 37%). Despite greater baseline adhesions, median reformation was less after icodextrin (24%) than RLS (60%). The pilot study group sizes were not powered for statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, 4% icodextrin lavage plus instillation was well tolerated and reduced adhesion formation and reformation following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. A Phase III pivotal study is currently in progress.

Key words: glucose polymer/icodextrin/laparoscopic surgery/peritoneal adhesions/post-surgical adhesions

7 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: ML Laboratories PLC, Blaby Hall, Church Street, Blaby, Leicester LE8 4FA, UK. E-mail: sjsverco{at}aol.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
C. Nappi, A. Di Spiezio Sardo, E. Greco, M. Guida, S. Bettocchi, and G. Bifulco
Prevention of adhesions in gynaecological endoscopy
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2007; 13(4): 379 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Mais, G.L. Bracco, P. Litta, T. Gargiulo, and G.B. Melis
Reduction of postoperative adhesions with an auto-crosslinked hyaluronan gel in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a blinded, controlled, randomized, multicentre study
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1248 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Lundorff, J. Donnez, M. Korell, A.J.M. Audebert, K. Block, and G.S. diZerega
Clinical evaluation of a viscoelastic gel for reduction of adhesions following gynaecological surgery by laparoscopy in Europe
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 514 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Acunzo, M. Guida, M. Pellicano, G. A. Tommaselli, A. Di Spiezio Sardo, G. Bifulco, D. Cirillo, A. Taylor, and C. Nappi
Effectiveness of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1918 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.