Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van der Auwera, I.
Right arrow Articles by D'Hooghe, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van der Auwera, I.
Right arrow Articles by D'Hooghe, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1507-1512, June 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer

Ingrid Van der Auwera,1, Sophie Debrock, Carl Spiessens, Hilde Afschrift, Els Bakelants, Christel Meuleman, Luc Meeuwis and Thomas M. D'Hooghe

Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Catholic University Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled study was performed in an unselected IVF/ICSI population to test the hypothesis that blastocyst transfers result in higher clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) per oocyte retrieval when compared with day 2 transfers. METHODS: Blind randomization for transfer on day 2 (group 1) or day 5/6 (group 2) was performed before stimulation. Oocytes and embryos were cultured in sequential media in 5.5% CO2, 5% O2, 89.5% N2 and 90% humidity. A maximum of two embryos was transferred. RESULTS: The two groups were similar for age, IVF indication, number of treatment cycles, rate of ICSI/IVF, number of fertilized oocytes and number of embryos transferred. The CPR/oocyte retrieval was comparable in group 1 (32%) and in group 2 (44%), while the CPR/embryo transfer was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in group 2 (60%) than in group 1 (35%). Similarly, the implantation rate per embryo transferred was significantly higher (P < 0.03) in group 2 (46%) than in group 1 (29%). The cryo-augmented delivery rate/oocyte retrieval was comparable in group 2 (36.3%) and in group 1 (28.6%). CONCLUSION: This randomized study in an unselected population showed a significantly higher CPR/embryo transfer and a tendency toward a higher CPR/oocyte retrieval in patients receiving blastocysts when compared with day 2 transfers.

Key words: blastocyst/embryo transfer/human/sequential media

1 E-mail address: Ingrid.Vanderauwera{at}pandora.be


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. G. Papanikolaou, E. M. Kolibianakis, H. Tournaye, C. A Venetis, H. Fatemi, B. Tarlatzis, and P. Devroey
Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 91 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail
Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. G. Papanikolaou, E. D'haeseleer, G. Verheyen, H. Van de Velde, M. Camus, A. Van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye
Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3198 - 3203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.M. Kissin, L.A. Schieve, and M.A. Reynolds
Multiple-birth risk associated with IVF and extended embryo culture: USA, 2001
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2215 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Schwarzler, H. Zech, M. Auer, K. Pfau, G. Gobel, P. Vanderzwalmen, and N. Zech
Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2097 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Wright, L. A. Schieve, A. Vahratian, and M. A. Reynolds
Monozygotic twinning associated with day 5 embryo transfer in pregnancies conceived after IVF
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1831 - 1836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Utsunomiya, H. Ito, M. Nagaki, and J. Sato
A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1598 - 1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.A. Blake, M. Proctor, and N.P. Johnson
The merits of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a Cochrane review
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 795 - 807.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Emiliani, A. Delbaere, A.-S. Vannin, J. Biramane, M. Verdoodt, Y. Englert, and F. Devreker
Similar delivery rates in a selected group of patients, for day 2 and day 5 embryos both cultured in sequential medium: a randomized study
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2145 - 2150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Salumets, C. Hyden-Granskog, S. Makinen, A.-M. Suikkari, A. Tiitinen, and T. Tuuri
Early cleavage predicts the viability of human embryos in elective single embryo transfer procedures
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 821 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. D'Hooghe, S. Debrock, C. Spiessens, H. Afschrift, E. Bakelants, C. Meuleman, and L. Meeuwis
Prospective randomized study on day of embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 893 - 893.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.