Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1507-1512,
June 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer
Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Catholic University Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled study was performed in an unselected IVF/ICSI population to test the hypothesis that blastocyst transfers result in higher clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) per oocyte retrieval when compared with day 2 transfers. METHODS: Blind randomization for transfer on day 2 (group 1) or day 5/6 (group 2) was performed before stimulation. Oocytes and embryos were cultured in sequential media in 5.5% CO2, 5% O2, 89.5% N2 and 90% humidity. A maximum of two embryos was transferred. RESULTS: The two groups were similar for age, IVF indication, number of treatment cycles, rate of ICSI/IVF, number of fertilized oocytes and number of embryos transferred. The CPR/oocyte retrieval was comparable in group 1 (32%) and in group 2 (44%), while the CPR/embryo transfer was significantly higher (P < 0.01) in group 2 (60%) than in group 1 (35%). Similarly, the implantation rate per embryo transferred was significantly higher (P < 0.03) in group 2 (46%) than in group 1 (29%). The cryo-augmented delivery rate/oocyte retrieval was comparable in group 2 (36.3%) and in group 1 (28.6%). CONCLUSION: This randomized study in an unselected population showed a significantly higher CPR/embryo transfer and a tendency toward a higher CPR/oocyte retrieval in patients receiving blastocysts when compared with day 2 transfers.
Key words: blastocyst/embryo transfer/human/sequential media
1 E-mail address: Ingrid.Vanderauwera{at}pandora.be
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. G. Papanikolaou, E. M. Kolibianakis, H. Tournaye, C. A Venetis, H. Fatemi, B. Tarlatzis, and P. Devroey Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 91 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Papanikolaou, E. D'haeseleer, G. Verheyen, H. Van de Velde, M. Camus, A. Van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3198 - 3203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.M. Kissin, L.A. Schieve, and M.A. Reynolds Multiple-birth risk associated with IVF and extended embryo culture: USA, 2001 Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2215 - 2223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schwarzler, H. Zech, M. Auer, K. Pfau, G. Gobel, P. Vanderzwalmen, and N. Zech Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2097 - 2102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Wright, L. A. Schieve, A. Vahratian, and M. A. Reynolds Monozygotic twinning associated with day 5 embryo transfer in pregnancies conceived after IVF Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1831 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Utsunomiya, H. Ito, M. Nagaki, and J. Sato A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1598 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.A. Blake, M. Proctor, and N.P. Johnson The merits of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a Cochrane review Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 795 - 807. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Emiliani, A. Delbaere, A.-S. Vannin, J. Biramane, M. Verdoodt, Y. Englert, and F. Devreker Similar delivery rates in a selected group of patients, for day 2 and day 5 embryos both cultured in sequential medium: a randomized study Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2145 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Salumets, C. Hyden-Granskog, S. Makinen, A.-M. Suikkari, A. Tiitinen, and T. Tuuri Early cleavage predicts the viability of human embryos in elective single embryo transfer procedures Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 821 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D'Hooghe, S. Debrock, C. Spiessens, H. Afschrift, E. Bakelants, C. Meuleman, and L. Meeuwis Prospective randomized study on day of embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 893 - 893. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

