Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tao, J.
Right arrow Articles by Craig, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tao, J.
Right arrow Articles by Craig, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1513-1518, June 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer

Jun Tao1,2,3, Robert Tamis1, Katharine Fink1, Brenda Williams2, Tresa Nelson-White2 and Randall Craig2

1 Arizona Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona and 2 Fertility Treatment Centre, Chandler, Arizona, USA

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study analysed the outcomes of 339 embryo transfers on either day 3 (n = 97) or day 4 (n = 242), and proposed a grading system for morula/compact embryos. METHODS: The morula/compact embryo grading was based on: (i) the proportion of blastomeres undergoing the compaction process; (ii) the morphology of the compacted multicellular mass; (iii) the embryo quality on day 2 and 3; and (iv) the amount of fragmentation. Embryo transfers were classified into groups as follows: group I: transferred with zero `good' embryos; group II: one `good' embryo; group III: two or more `good' embryos. RESULTS: Patients on day 4 were transferred with significantly fewer embryos in groups II and III (2.58 ± 0.9 and 2.35 ± 0.6 respectively) when compared with the correspondent day 3 transfers (3.81 ± 1.4 and 4.07 ± 0.9 respectively) (P < 0.05), but had the same or higher implantation and pregnancy rates. Analysing the patients who had transfers with all `good' embryos, day 4 transfer achieved a significantly higher implantation rate compared with day 3 transfer (46.4 versus 21.4%, P < 0.01), but the number of embryos transferred on day 4 was significantly lower than day 3 (2.1 ± 0.5 versus 3.5 ± 0.9, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The morula/compact embryos had great value for embryo selection, which significantly reduced the number of embryos needed for transfer.

Key words: compact/embryo grading/implantation/morula/selection

3 Fertility Treatment Centre, 3200 N Dobson Road, Chandler, AZ 85224, USA. E-mail: jtftc{at}aol.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
J. Dreesen, M. Drusedau, H. Smeets, C. de Die-Smulders, E. Coonen, J. Dumoulin, M. Gielen, J. Evers, J. Herbergs, and J. Geraedts
Validation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by PCR analysis: genotype comparison of the blastomere and corresponding embryo, implications for clinical practice
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 14(10): 573 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Feil, R. C. Henshaw, and M. Lane
Day 4 embryo selection is equal to Day 5 using a new embryo scoring system validated in single embryo transfers
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1505 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.