Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 6, 1513-1518,
June 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer
1 Arizona Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona and 2 Fertility Treatment Centre, Chandler, Arizona, USA
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study analysed the outcomes of 339 embryo transfers on either day 3 (n = 97) or day 4 (n = 242), and proposed a grading system for morula/compact embryos. METHODS: The morula/compact embryo grading was based on: (i) the proportion of blastomeres undergoing the compaction process; (ii) the morphology of the compacted multicellular mass; (iii) the embryo quality on day 2 and 3; and (iv) the amount of fragmentation. Embryo transfers were classified into groups as follows: group I: transferred with zero `good' embryos; group II: one `good' embryo; group III: two or more `good' embryos. RESULTS: Patients on day 4 were transferred with significantly fewer embryos in groups II and III (2.58 ± 0.9 and 2.35 ± 0.6 respectively) when compared with the correspondent day 3 transfers (3.81 ± 1.4 and 4.07 ± 0.9 respectively) (P < 0.05), but had the same or higher implantation and pregnancy rates. Analysing the patients who had transfers with all `good' embryos, day 4 transfer achieved a significantly higher implantation rate compared with day 3 transfer (46.4 versus 21.4%, P < 0.01), but the number of embryos transferred on day 4 was significantly lower than day 3 (2.1 ± 0.5 versus 3.5 ± 0.9, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The morula/compact embryos had great value for embryo selection, which significantly reduced the number of embryos needed for transfer.
Key words: compact/embryo grading/implantation/morula/selection
3 Fertility Treatment Centre, 3200 N Dobson Road, Chandler, AZ 85224, USA. E-mail: jtftc{at}aol.com
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Dreesen, M. Drusedau, H. Smeets, C. de Die-Smulders, E. Coonen, J. Dumoulin, M. Gielen, J. Evers, J. Herbergs, and J. Geraedts Validation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by PCR analysis: genotype comparison of the blastomere and corresponding embryo, implications for clinical practice Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 14(10): 573 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Feil, R. C. Henshaw, and M. Lane Day 4 embryo selection is equal to Day 5 using a new embryo scoring system validated in single embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1505 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


