Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 7, 1846-1851,
July 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
A prospective trial of blastocyst culture and transfer
St Luke Clinic, 5, Tsumori-Tomioka, Oita City, 870-0947, Japan
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the blastocyst culture method compared with the conventional day 3 transfer method using a prospective trial. METHODS: A total of 235 patients with 273 cycles were evaluated for a period of almost 1 year. Depending upon the sequence in which the ovum retrieval was performed, patients were prospectively assigned (alternate allocation) to a culture period of 3 or 5 days duration. Embryos were transferred either on day 3 (after culture in human tubal fluid) or on day 5 (after culture in sequential media). RESULTS: The pregnancy rates after embryo transfer on days 3 and 5 were similar at 26.5 and 25.9% respectively. Among the day 5 embryo transfer group, patients were divided into three groups corresponding to three sequential media. The pregnancy rates were 32.0% using Irvine blastocyst medium, 6.9% using G1.2/G2.2 and 32.4% using Cook blastocyst medium. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study were not as successful as previous studies had been. Additionally, there may have been problems in day 5 embryo transfer, such as choosing the sequential media, quality control, contamination and so on. From the results of this study, it appears that day 5 embryo transfer has no advantages for ordinary patients of assisted reproductive technology.
Key words: assisted reproduction/blastocyst/embryo transfer/pregnancy/sequential media
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: St-luke{at}oct-net.ne.jp
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Zikopoulos, W. Verpoest, M. Camus, H. Joris, A.C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey Should we advise patients undergoing IVF to start a cycle leading to a day 3 or a day 5 transfer? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2550 - 2554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Utsunomiya, H. Ito, M. Nagaki, and J. Sato A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1598 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Emiliani, A. Delbaere, A.-S. Vannin, J. Biramane, M. Verdoodt, Y. Englert, and F. Devreker Similar delivery rates in a selected group of patients, for day 2 and day 5 embryos both cultured in sequential medium: a randomized study Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2145 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Lambert Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: The children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologies Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3011 - 3015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|