Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matorras, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Escudero, F.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matorras, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Escudero, F.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 8, 2107-2111, August 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination with donor sperm: a randomized study comparing clomiphene citrate in fixed protocol versus highly purified urinary FSH

R. Matorras1,3, T. Diaz1, B. Corcostegui1, O. Ramón1, J.I. Pijoan2 and F.J. Rodriguez-Escudero1

1 Human Reproductive Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 Clinical Epidemiology Unit, País Vasco University, Hospital from Cruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to compare the results of intrauterine donor insemination (DI) under ovarian stimulation with either clomiphene citrate (CC), in a fixed protocol, or FSH, with ovarian monitoring. METHODS: Forty-nine patients were randomized using a computer-generated list to receive highly purified urinary FSH (starting dose of 150 IU) and were subjected to periodic vaginal ultrasound and estradiol determinations. HCG was given when >=2 follicles (>=17 mm) were identified and estradiol reached >400 pg/ml. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) was performed 36 h later. The other 51 received CC on a fixed protocol (100 mg/day from the day 5–10 of the ovarian cycle) with HCG being administered on the day 12, and IUI performed 36 h later. Up to six IUI cycles were performed on all patients if pregnancy was not reached before. Women failing to conceive in the CC group underwent IUI with FSH. The main outcome measures were intrauterine gestational sac observed by transvaginal ultrasound, per cycle and per woman pregnancy rate (PR) and multiple PR. RESULTS: The per cycle PR was significantly higher in the FSH group, 14.4% (30/209) versus 6.1% (16/261), as well as the per woman PR, 61.2% (30/49) versus 31.4% (16/51). 12.5% (2/16) of pregnancies obtained in the CC group were multiple, compared with 20% (6/30) in the FSH group. There were no triplets or higher order pregnancies in CC versus two in FSH (6.7% of pregnancies). Patients failing to conceive with CC, who later underwent intrauterine DI with FSH, had similar results to the primary FSH group: 54.3% PR per patient (19/35) and 16.0% per cycle (19/118), with a multiple PR of 31.6% (6/19). The PR for women starting with CC cycles and, if pregnancy was not obtained, continuing with six FSH cycles, was 69.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The PR obtained with CC stimulation was approximately half that obtained with FSH. There was a trend to lower multiple PR with CC. It is recommended that each case should be considered on an individual basis and the treatment options discussed with patients. In our opinion, CC could be a reasonable approach for young women with good prognosis, whereas in the remaining cases FSH would be the preferable method.

Key words: clomiphene citrate stimulation/FSH stimulation/intrauterine donor insemination/pregnancy rate/prospective randomized trial

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: María Diaz de Haro 7, 6iz. 48013 Bilbao, Spain. E-mail: rmatorras{at}hcru.osakidetza.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Intrauterine insemination
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2009; 15(3): 265 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Dankert, J.A.M. Kremer, B.J. Cohlen, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, P.C.M. Pasker-de Jong, H. Straatman, and P.A. van Dop
A randomized clinical trial of clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 792 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Allegra, A. Marino, F. Coffaro, P. Scaglione, F. Sammartano, G. Rizza, and A. Volpes
GnRH antagonist-induced inhibition of the premature LH surge increases pregnancy rates in IUI-stimulated cycles. A prospective randomized trial
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 101 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail
Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.B. Lambalk, A. Leader, F. Olivennes, M.R. Fluker, A. N. Andersen, J. Ingerslev, Y. Khalaf, C. Avril, J. Belaisch-Allart, R. Roulier, et al.
Treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix prevents premature LH rises and luteinization in stimulated intrauterine insemination: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 632 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.