Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klemetti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klemetti, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 8, 2192-2198, August 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Comparison of perinatal health of children born from IVF in Finland in the early and late 1990s

Reija Klemetti,1, Mika Gissler and Elina Hemminki

STAKES, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether perinatal health outcomes changed during the 1990s with the increasing use of IVF. METHODS: Data were from the Finnish Medical Birth Register for periods 1991–1993 and 1998–1999. Outcomes of IVF infants and other infants were compared, both overall and separately for singleton and multiple births, by adjusting for mothers' background variables by logistic regression. RESULTS: The IVF multiple birth rate, especially the number of triplets, declined from the first (1991–1993) to the second (1998–1999) time-period. The outcomes for IVF newborns improved, especially for multiple births. After adjusting for mothers' background variables, the odds ratios for preterm birth and low birthweight decreased among singletons from 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8–2.8] to 1.8 (CI 1.5–2.1) and from 2.4 (CI 1.9–3.1) to 1.7 (CI 1.4–2.1) respectively and more among multiples from 2.4 (CI 2.0–2.9) to 1.5 (CI 1.2–1.7) and from 1.9 (CI 1.6–2.3) to 1.1 (CI 1.0–1.3) respectively. Still, overall the outcomes for IVF infants remained poorer than those for other infants. A correlation was found between increased use of antenatal services and improved outcomes, but causality cannot be assumed. CONCLUSION: A trend of improved perinatal health of multiple IVF children was found, mainly due to a decrease in higher order multiple births.

Key words: epidemiology/IVF/Medical Birth Register/perinatal health/temporal trends

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: P.O.Box 220, 00531 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: reija.klemetti{at}stakes.fi


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hansen, L. Colvin, B. Petterson, J. J. Kurinczuk, N. de Klerk, and C. Bower
Twins born following assisted reproductive technology: perinatal outcome and admission to hospital
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2321 - 2331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. L. Boulet, L. A. Schieve, A. Nannini, C. Ferre, O. Devine, B. Cohen, Z. Zhang, V. Wright, and M. Macaluso
Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: a population-based study
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1941 - 1948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. Shih, D.D. Rushford, H. Bourne, C. Garrett, J.C. McBain, D.L. Healy, and H.W.G. Baker
Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1644 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Poikkeus, M. Gissler, L. Unkila-Kallio, C. Hyden-Granskog, and A. Tiitinen
Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1073 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.K. Ludwig, M. Glawatz, G. Griesinger, K. Diedrich, and M. Ludwig
Perioperative and post-operative complications of transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval: prospective study of >1000 oocyte retrievals
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3235 - 3240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Klemetti, T. Sevon, M. Gissler, and E. Hemminki
Health of Children Born as a Result of In Vitro Fertilization
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 1819 - 1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Soderstrom-Anttila, T. Salokorpi, M. Pihlaja, S. Serenius-Sirve, and A.-M. Suikkari
Obstetric and perinatal outcome and preliminary results of development of children born after in vitro maturation of oocytes
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1508 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.K. Ludwig, A. Katalinic, V. Steinbicker, K. Diedrich, and M. Ludwig
Antenatal care in singleton pregnancies after ICSI as compared to spontaneous conception: data from a prospective controlled cohort study in Germany
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 713 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Pinborg
IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 575 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Koivurova, A.-L. Hartikainen, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, R. Klemetti, and M.-R. Jarvelin
Health care costs resulting from IVF: prenatal and neonatal periods
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2798 - 2805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. A. Schieve and M. A. Reynolds
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Challenges in measuring and reporting success rates for assisted reproductive technology treatments: What is optimal?
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 778 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.