Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Abstract-only PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandian, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandian, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 10, 2001-2007, October 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The effectiveness of IVF in unexplained infertility: a systematic Cochrane review

Zabeena Pandian1,3, Siladitya Bhattacharya1, Dimitrios Nikolaou1, Luke Vale2 and Allan Templeton1

1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital and 2 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: z.pandian{at}abdn.ac.ukThis paper is based on a Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library, issue 2, 2002 (see www.CochraneLibrary.net for information) with permission from The Cochrane Collaboration and Update Software. Cochrane reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.

BACKGROUND: IVF is an accepted treatment for unexplained infertility. The objective of this review was to determine whether, for unexplained infertility, IVF improves the probability of live birth compared with: (i) expectant management; (ii) clomiphene citrate (CC); (iii) intrauterine insemination (IUI); (iv) IUI with controlled ovarian stimulation; and (v) gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT). METHODS: This was based on a Cochrane review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the effectiveness of IVF with expectant management, CC, IUI with or without controlled ovarian stimulation and GIFT were included. Patients included couples with unexplained infertility. Live birth rate per woman/couple was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Nine RCT were identified. Five RCTs were included in the final meta-analysis. There were no comparative data for CC and live birth rates for expectant management or GIFT. There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between IVF and expectant management. There was no evidence of a difference in live birth rates between IVF and IUI either without (OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 4.36) or with (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.42) ovarian stimulation. Clinical pregnancy rates with IVF were significantly higher compared with GIFT (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.22) as were the multiple pregnancy rates (OR 6.25, 95% CI 1.70 to 23.00). Clinical heterogeneity was present among the studies. There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of IVF in unexplained infertility remains unproven. Larger trials with adequate power are warranted.

Key words: clomiphene citrate/expectant/gamete intra-Fallopian transfer/intrauterine insemination/unexplained infertility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Allegra, A. Marino, F. Coffaro, P. Scaglione, F. Sammartano, G. Rizza, and A. Volpes
GnRH antagonist-induced inhibition of the premature LH surge increases pregnancy rates in IUI-stimulated cycles. A prospective randomized trial
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 101 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.B. Lambalk, A. Leader, F. Olivennes, M.R. Fluker, A. N. Andersen, J. Ingerslev, Y. Khalaf, C. Avril, J. Belaisch-Allart, R. Roulier, et al.
Treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix prevents premature LH rises and luteinization in stimulated intrauterine insemination: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 632 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.C. Haagen, W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G. Hermens, D.D.M. Braat, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
Barriers to physician adherence to a subfertility guideline
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3301 - 3306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.