Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 10, 2093-2097,
October 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Pregnancy outcome and neonatal data of children born after ICSI using testicular sperm in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia
1 Centre For Reproductive Medicine and 2 Center for Medical Genetics, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: valerie.vernaeve{at}az.vub.ac.be
BACKGROUND: Registries on outcome of ICSI pregnancies obtained with testicular sperm do not differentiate between obstructive (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). We evaluated the pregnancy outcome and neonatal data on children born after ICSI using testicular sperm of men with histologically proven OA or NOA. METHODS: Pregnancies obtained after ICSI using testicular sperm of men with defined NOA (n = 70) were compared with those of men with OA (n = 204). RESULTS: Multiple birth rates in NOA and OA couples, respectively, were 21 versus 27% (P = NS), overall preterm delivery rates were 38 versus 26% (NS), and prematurity rates were 24 versus 13% for singletons (NS) and 86 versus 54% for twins (relative risk 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.04–2.42). Median gestational age for singletons was 38.3 versus 39.3 weeks, respectively (P < 0.05). The low birth weight rates were 34 versus 31%, respectively (NS). The early perinatal mortality rate was 66 versus 15 per 1000 births, respectively, (NS). Major congenital malformations were observed in 4 versus 3%, respectively, of the live born babies (NS). Prenatal karyotypes showed 7% de-novo abnormalities in the NOA group versus 1% in the OA group (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not show differences between NOA and OA pregnancies except for a strong tendency towards a lower gestational age in singletons and a higher percentage of premature twins in the NOA group. Although our data are based on a limited sample, the differences observed call for further analysis. Given the low pregnancy rates after ICSI with NOA, a multicentre study, differentiating NOA and OA patients, would be recommended.
Key words: azoospermia/follow-up/ICSI/pregnancy outcome/testicular sperm
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: Evidence and Evolution Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 515 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Koscinski, C. Wittemer, V. Lefebvre-Khalil, F. Marcelli, A. Defossez, and J.M. Rigot Optimal management of extreme oligozoospermia by an appropriate cryopreservation programme Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2679 - 2684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Buffat, C. Patrat, F. Merlet, J. Guibert, S. Epelboin, N. Thiounn, A. Vieillefond, A. Adda-Lievin, C. Lebon, and P. Jouannet ICSI outcomes in obstructive azoospermia: influence of the origin of surgically retrieved spermatozoa and the cause of obstruction Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1018 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Stouffs, W. Lissens, H. Tournaye, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers The choice and outcome of the fertility treatment of 38 couples in whom the male partner has a Yq microdeletion Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1887 - 1896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|