Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tesarik, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tesarik, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 10, 2122-2123, October 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Associate Editor's commentary: Rescue ICSI revisited

Jan Tesarik

MAR&Gen, Molecular Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Gracia 36, 18002 Granada, Spain. e-mail: cmendoza@ugr.es

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

ICSI was first applied in cases of severe male factor infertility in which conventional IVF would be expected to fail or to give poor outcomes (Van Steirteghem et al., 1993Go). More recently, however, ICSI has been increasingly used in cases in which conventional IVF would not necessarily be inefficient. In such cases, ICSI is often preferred because of its reliability in terms of achieving high fertilization rates despite the occurrence and severity of different sperm abnormalities, some of which are not detectable by standard semen examinations. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?