Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emiliani, S.
Right arrow Articles by Devreker, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emiliani, S.
Right arrow Articles by Devreker, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 10, 2145-2150, October 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Similar delivery rates in a selected group of patients, for day 2 and day 5 embryos both cultured in sequential medium: a randomized study

Serena Emiliani1, Anne Delbaere, Anne-Sophie Vannin, Jamila Biramane, Miranda Verdoodt, Yvon Englert and Fabienne Devreker

Fertility Clinic, Erasme Hospital, Free University of Brussels, French Speaking, 808, Route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: semilian{at}ulb.ac.be

BACKGROUND: The existence of a real benefit of blastocyst transfer is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to compare, in a prospective randomized trial, the outcome of day 2 and day 5 transfer of human embryos cultured in an ‘in-house’ sequential medium. METHODS: A total of 193 cycles from 171 patients with less than four previous IVF cycles, <39 years old and with four or more zygotes on day 1, were randomly allocated to day 2 (94 cycles) or day 5 (99 cycles) transfer. Zygotes were kept in fertilization medium until 18 h post-fertilization and then placed in a ‘glucose-free’ cleavage medium. Embryos allocated for day 5 transfer were placed in a blastocyst medium 66 h post-fertilization. Two or three embryos were replaced according to the morphology. RESULTS: A mean (± SEM) number of 2.1 ± 0.4 and 1.9 ± 0.3 embryos were replaced on day 2 and day 5 (P < 0.001) respectively. Delivery rates per transfer were 44.1 and 37.1% [P = not significant (NS)], implantation rates were 31.4 and 29.4% (NS) and multiple delivery rates 22 and 36% (NS) for day 2 and day 5 groups respectively. Ten patients (10.1%) had no blastocysts available for transfer. CONCLUSIONS: No clear benefits were observed using blastocyst transfer for patients aged <39 years who had had less than four previous IVF cycle attempts.

Key words: blastocyst culture/embryo transfer/IVF/sequential media


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. G. Papanikolaou, E. M. Kolibianakis, H. Tournaye, C. A Venetis, H. Fatemi, B. Tarlatzis, and P. Devroey
Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 91 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.M. Kissin, L.A. Schieve, and M.A. Reynolds
Multiple-birth risk associated with IVF and extended embryo culture: USA, 2001
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2215 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Daelemans, G. Smits, V. de Maertelaer, S. Costagliola, Y. Englert, G. Vassart, and A. Delbaere
Prediction of Severity of Symptoms in Iatrogenic Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome by Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Ser680Asn Polymorphism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6310 - 6315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.