Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hinsch, K.-D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hinsch, K.-D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 10, 2231-2234, October 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons:a representative survey from Germany

E. Dahl1,3, M. Beutel2, B. Brosig2 and K.-D. Hinsch1

1 Centre for Dermatology and Andrology and 2 Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre for Dermatology and Andrology, University of Giessen, Gaffkystr. 14, D-35385 Giessen, Germany. e-mail: Edgar.Dahl{at}derma.med.uni-giessen.de

BACKGROUND: Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons raises serious moral, legal and social issues. The main concern is based on the assumption that a freely available service for sex selection will distort the natural sex ratio and lead to a severe gender imbalance. However, for a severe gender imbalance to happen, at least two conditions have to be met. First, there must be a significant preference for children of a particular sex, and second, there must be a considerable demand for preconception sex selection. To ascertain whether or not these two conditions are met, we have conducted a survey in Germany. METHODS: As a representative sample of the German population, 1094 men and women aged 18–45 years were asked about their gender preferences and whether or not they could imagine selecting the sex of their children through flow cytometric separation of X- and Y-bearing sperm followed by intrauterine insemination. RESULTS: 58% of respondents stated that they do not care about the sex of their offspring. 30% wish to have a family with an equal number of boys and girls. 4% would like to have more boys than girls, 3% more girls than boys, 1% only boys and 1% only girls. For first-borns, however, there is still a preference for boys over girls. While 75.6% claimed to have no gender preference, 14.2% would like their first child to be a boy and 10.1% would like their first child to be a girl. Whereas 6% could imagine taking advantage of preconception sex selection, 92% found this to be out of the question. Even in the hypothetical case that a medication for sex selection were ever to become available, 90% stated that they would not want to use it. CONCLUSION: Given that a majority does not seem to care about the sex of their offspring and only a minority seem to be willing to select the sex of their children, a freely available service for preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons is rather unlikely to cause a severe gender imbalance in Germany.

Key words: sex selection/sperm sorting/gender preferences/sex ratio distortion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Ahmad Al-Akour, M. Khassawneh, Y. Khader, and E. Dahl
Sex preference and interest in preconception sex selection: a survey among pregnant women in the north of Jordan
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1665 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
Z O Merhi and L Pal
Gender "tailored" conceptions: should the option of embryo gender selection be available to infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology?
J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2008; 34(8): 590 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Gleicher and D. H. Barad
The choice of gender: is elective gender selection, indeed, sexist?
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 3038 - 3041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U. Meister, C. Finck, Y. Stobel-Richter, G. Schmutzer, and E. Brahler
Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 231 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Dahl, K.-D. Hinsch, M. Beutel, and B. Brosig
Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons: a representative survey from the UK
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2238 - 2239.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.