Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darai, E.
Right arrow Articles by Delga, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darai, E.
Right arrow Articles by Delga, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 11, 2454-2459, November 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic–perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty in women with Rokitansky’s syndrome

Emile Darai1,4, Olivier Toullalan1, Olivier Besse2, Lucien Potiron3 and Patrice Delga3

1 Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Tenon Paris, AP-HP, 2 Clinique Notre-Dame de Grâce, Nantes and 3 Clinique Mutualiste de Nantes, France

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: emile.darai{at}tnn.ap-hop-paris.fr

BACKGROUND: The Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a rare congenital cause of primary amenorrhea, due to utero-vaginal agenesis. Several surgical techniques have been used to create a neovagina. Neovagina construction with a sigmoid graft appears to be the best option, as it offers adequate length and natural lubrication, allowing early intercourse. However, few data are available on the complications, anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic–perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty. METHODS: From September 1995 to November 2002, seven women with the MRKH syndrome underwent laparoscopic–perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid grafting. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 312 min (range 220–450 min). The mean fall in haemoglobin was 3.6 g/dl (range 2–4.4 g/dl). Blood transfusion was never necessary. The only perioperative complications were one urinary tract infection and one vulvar haematoma not requiring drainage. The mean hospital stay was 7.7 days (range 6–12 days). The mean length of the neovagina was 11.5 cm (range 7–15 cm), and no shrinkage occurred during follow-up. The neovaginal introitus admitted two fingers in breadth in five of the seven patients. Dilation of the introitus was required in the other two women. None of the four women who had intercourse experienced dyspareunia or discomfort. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the feasibility of laparoscopic–perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty, when performed by surgeons with extensive experience in both gynaecological and gastrointestinal laparoscopic surgery. The anatomic and functional results were good.

Key words: laparoscopy/neovagina/Rokitansky’s syndrome/sigmoid transplant/vaginal agenesis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Oppelt, S. P. Renner, A. Kellermann, S. Brucker, G. A. Hauser, K. S. Ludwig, P. L. Strissel, R. Strick, D. Wallwiener, and M. W. Beckmann
Clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser syndrome: recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 792 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Giannesi, P. Marchiole, M. Benchaib, M. Chevret-Measson, P. Mathevet, and D. Dargent
Sexuality after laparoscopic Davydov in patients affected by congenital complete vaginal agenesis associated with uterine agenesis or hypoplasia
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2954 - 2957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.