Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 2, 455-457,
February 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: Report of an ESHRE consensus meeting*
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. e-mail: jlan{at}sgyn.azm.nl
Assisted reproduction technique (ART) is an efficacious treatment in subfertile couples. So far little attention has been paid to the safety of ART, i.e. to its adverse events and complications. The consensus meeting on Risks and Complications in ART held in Maastricht in May 2002 focused on four topics: multiple pregnancies, long-term effects of ART on women, effects of ART on offspring, and morbidity/mortality registries.
Key words: ART complications/ART risks/congenital malformations/elective single embryo transfer/multiple pregnancy
*A consensus meeting was organized by ESHRE (Maastricht, May 4–5, 2002). The speakers included: E.Bryan (London), C.W.Burger (Rotterdam), M.Camus (Brussels), M.Dhont (Gent), J.Gerris (Antwerp), O.Hovatta (Huddinge), J.A.M.Kremer (Nijmegen), K.Lundin (Gothenburg), E.Nieschlag (Münster), J.G.Nijhuis (Maastricht), K.G.Nygren (Stockholm), C.Staessen (Brussels), E.Van Royen (Antwerp), S.Vilska (Helsinki) and U.B.Wennerholm (Gothenburg).
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Bechoua, K. Astruc, S. Thouvenot, S. Girod, A. Chiron, C. Jimenez, and P. Sagot How to demonstrate that eSET does not compromise the likelihood of having a baby? Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3073 - 3081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Devroey, B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2009; 15(4): 391 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A.A. Fiddelers, C. D. Dirksen, J. C.M. Dumoulin, A. P.A. van Montfoort, J. A. Land, J. M. Janssen, J. L.H. Evers, and J. L. Severens Cost-effectiveness of seven IVF strategies: results of a Markov decision-analytic model Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1648 - 1655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, M.H. Saussereau, V. Cadoret, C. Jamet, and D. Royere Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1051 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.M.E. van Rumste, I.M. Custers, F. van der Veen, M. van Wely, J.L.H. Evers, and B.W.J. Mol The influence of the number of follicles on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation: a meta-analysis Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2008; 14(6): 563 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Pennings and W. Ombelet Coming soon to your clinic: patient-friendly ART Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2075 - 2079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Donoso, W. Verpoest, E.G. Papanikolaou, I. Liebaers, H.M. Fatemi, K. Sermon, C. Staessen, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1021 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.A.A. Fiddelers, J.L. Severens, C.D. Dirksen, J.C.M. Dumoulin, J.A. Land, and J.L.H. Evers Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. van Wely, M. Twisk, B.W. Mol, and F. van der Veen Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2736 - 2738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. S. Daftary and H. S. Taylor Endocrine Regulation of HOX Genes Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2006; 27(4): 331 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P.A. van Montfoort, A. A.A. Fiddelers, J.M. Janssen, J. G. Derhaag, C. D. Dirksen, G. A.J. Dunselman, J. A. Land, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 338 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P.A. van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, J. A. Land, E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, and J. L.H. Evers Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 433 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, S. Rasmussen, and A. Nyboe Andersen Hospital care utilization of IVF/ICSI twins followed until 2-7 years of age: a controlled Danish national cohort study Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2529 - 2536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.C. Hunault, J.D.F. Habbema, M.J.C. Eijkemans, J.A. Collins, J.L.H. Evers, and E.R. te Velde Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2019 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. E. Messinis and E. Domali What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Should BESST really be the primary endpoint for assisted reproduction? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1933 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P.A. Van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, A. D.M. Kester, and J. L.H. Evers Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2103 - 2108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Griesinger, K. Dafopoulos, A. Schultze-Mosgau, R. Felberbaum, and K. Diedrich What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Is BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) truly the best? Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1239 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. P. Dickey, B. M. Sartor, and R. Pyrzak What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: No single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 783 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Aittomaki, U.-B. Wennerholm, C. Bergh, A. Selbing, J. Hazekamp, and K.-G. Nygren Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: Should ICSI patients have genetic testing before treatment? A practical proposition to help patient information Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 472 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. P. Dickey Clinical as well as statistical knowledge is needed when determining how subfertility trials are analysed Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2495 - 2496. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|