Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 3, 472-473,
March 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Reproductive semi-cloning respecting biparental origin
A biologically unsound principle
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa, Japan, 2 The Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology and Department of Biochemistry, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, and 3 The Institute for Biogenesis Research and Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: klatham{at}unix.temple.edu
The original debate article proposed the use of semi-cloning as a viable method for assisted reproduction. This debate counters the proposal as being biologically unsound. Given the fundamental limitations of chromosomal segregation and genomic imprinting, the notion of using the MII oocyte to drive haploidization of a somatic cell genome and thereby obtain a substitute for authentic gametes is ill-conceived and untenable.
Key words: assisted reproduction/cloning/gamete reconstruction/haploidization
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-U. Chen, C.-Y. Chang, C.-C. Lu, F.-J. Hsieh, H.-N. Ho, and Y.-S. Yang Microtubular spindle dynamics and chromosome complements from somatic cell nuclei haploidization in mature mouse oocytes and developmental potential of the derived embryos Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1181 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
