Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 4, 774-780,
April 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
The use of fixed distance embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI equalizes the success rates among physicians
1 Division for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht and 2 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Dr. Molenwaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: F.Broekmans{at}azu.nl
BACKGROUND: It is suggested that the skill of the physician performing the embryo transfer may influence the outcome of the procedure. In this study we investigated the effects of a change in embryo transfer technique on the variability in success rates among physicians. METHODS: Retrospectively 4439 transfer cycles in which two different embryo transfer techniques were applied by seven physicians were studied. In the first 2210 cycles, transfers were performed using the ‘clinical touch’ method. In the following 2229 cycles, the so-called fixed distance technique was used. RESULTS: With the clinical touch method pregnancy rates differed greatly among providers, whereas after the introduction of the fixed distance technique these differences disappeared. Furthermore, the overall clinical pregnancy rate increased from 33.6 to 40.4% per transfer. Using smoothing spline curves we failed to detect a sudden rise in pregnancy rates at the time the transfer method was changed. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the fixed distance technique greatly reduced the variation in pregnancy rates among physicians. The overall increase in pregnancy rates after the introduction is likely to be related to the change in technique although definite proof is difficult. Both observations are suggested to be attributable to the atraumatic character of the fixed distance technique.
Key words: embryo transfer technique/IVF–embryo transfer/physician/pregnancy rate
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. de Klerk, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, N.S. Macklon, H.J. Duivenvoorden, B.C.J.M. Fauser, J. Passchier, and J.A.M. Hunfeld The psychological impact of mild ovarian stimulation combined with single embryo transfer compared with conventional IVF Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 721 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.J.C. Eijkemans, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, C. de Klerk, J.D.F. Habbema, and B.C.J.M. Fauser Comparison of different treatment strategies in IVF with cumulative live birth over a given period of time as the primary end-point: methodological considerations on a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 344 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.J. Hendriks, F.J.M. Broekmans, L.F.J.M.M. Bancsi, F.H. de Jong, C.W.N. Looman, and E.R. te Velde Repeated clomiphene citrate challenge testing in the prediction of outcome in IVF: a comparison with basal markers for ovarian reserve Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.G. Franco Jr, A.M.V.C. Martins, R.L.R. Baruffi, A.L. Mauri, C.G. Petersen, V. Felipe, P. Contart, A. Pontes, and J.B.A. Oliveira Best site for embryo transfer: the upper or lower half of endometrial cavity? Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1785 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|