Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ola, B.
Right arrow Articles by Coomarasamy, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ola, B.
Right arrow Articles by Coomarasamy, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 5, 1037-1046, May 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Accuracy of sperm–cervical mucus penetration tests in evaluating sperm motility in semen: a systematic quantitative review

Bolarinde Ola1,3,4, Masoud Afnan1, Spyros Papaioannou1, Khaldoun Sharif1, Lars Björndahl1 and Aravinthan Coomarasamy2

1 The Assisted Conception Unit and 2 Education Resource Centre, Birmingham Women’s Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG and 3 Division of Reproductive and Child Health, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield SI0 2SF, UK. e-mail: BolarindeOla{at}aol.com

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to determine the accuracy of in-vitro sperm penetration into cervical mucus or substitutes in evaluating sperm motility in semen. METHODS: This was a systematic quantitative review of test accuracy studies. The Cochrane library (2000:4), Medline (1966–2001), Embase (1988–2001) and SciSearch (1981–2001) were searched, in addition to manual searches of conference papers and bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Primary studies measuring in-vitro sperm penetration into cervical mucus, or substitutes (i.e. sperm–mucus penetration test, SMPT) and comparing results with sperm motility in semen were included. RESULTS: There were 18 primary diagnostic studies published in 17 papers, involving a total of 2580 samples. Fourteen primary diagnostic tests used vanguard distance as diagnostic criteria (SMPTvd) and the pooled likelihood ratio (LR) for positive (LR+) and negative (LR–) tests were 2.29 (1.82–2.87) and 0.52 (0.44–0.63) respectively. Four studies used diagnostic criteria based directly or indirectly on swim-up sperm count per high power field (SMPTsc) instead. Their pooled LR+ and LR– were 5.24 (3.36–8.18) and 0.15 (0.06–0.39) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SMPTvd has a low accuracy in the evaluation of sperm motility in semen. However, SMPTsc was found to be more accurate. This method of using sperm concentration, instead of vanguard distance, as diagnostic criteria of in-vitro SMPT has potential as a useful laboratory-based sperm function test.

Key words: accuracy/hyaluronic acid/likelihood ratio/methyl cellulose/sperm–mucus penetration tests


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.