Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thong, K.J.
Right arrow Articles by Menezes, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thong, K.J.
Right arrow Articles by Menezes, Q.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1256-1258, June 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The administration of the GnRH antagonist, cetrorelix, to ooctye donors simplifies oocyte donation

K.J. Thong1,3, P.Y. Yong2 and Q. Menezes2

1 Assisted Conception Programme, Edinburgh Fertility and Reproductive Endocrine Centre, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Little France, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Scotland and 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kent Ridge Road, National University of Singapore, Singapore

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: joothong{at}hotmail.com

BACKGROUND: We report our experience on the efficacy of a new regimen of the GnRH antagonist, cetrorelix, and recombinant FSH, Gonal-F, for controlled ovarian stimulation in a donor oocyte programme. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six oocyte donors were commenced on Gonal-F (150 IU) and two on Gonal-F 225 IU daily on day 4 together with cetrorelix 0.25 mg daily on day 8 until the day of administration of hCG. Six premenopausal recipients were down-regulated with intranasal Nafarelin 400 µg twice daily; two women with premature menopause did not require down-regulation for synchronization between donor and recipient cycles. The median (range) of oocytes retrieved and the median (range) fertilization rates were 7 (3–13) and 50% (0–71%) respectively. With the exception of a recipient who had failed fertilization, seven recipients had two embryos transferred. The median (range) number of days of ovarian stimulation, cetrorelix administration and number of Gonal-F ampoules administered for ovarian stimulation were 9 (7–12) days, 5 (3–8) and 18 (14–24) respectively. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 50% (4/8) and one of the latter women miscarried at eight weeks gestation. Three women (37.3%) had full term deliveries. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study has shown that using a combination of cetrorelix and Gonal-F resulted in a high pregnancy rate, reduced the duration of treatment for the donor and simplified oocyte donation.

Key words: cetrorelix/donor/FSH/oocyte/recombinant


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Vani, S. E. McDonald, A. R.W. Williams, J. I. Mason, K. J. Thong, and H. O.D. Critchley
Mid-luteal endometrial intracrinology following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation involving use of a gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2981 - 2991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Bodri, V. Vernaeve, J.J. Guillen, R. Vidal, F. Figueras, and O. Coll
Comparison between a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in oocyte donors: a randomized clinical trial
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2246 - 2251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Prapas, Y. Prapas, Y. Panagiotidis, S. Prapa, P. Vanderzwalmen, R. Schoysman, and G. Makedos
GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1516 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.