Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burrello, N.
Right arrow Articles by Calogero, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burrello, N.
Right arrow Articles by Calogero, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1371-1376, July 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Lower sperm aneuploidy frequency is associated with high pregnancy rates in ICSI programmes

Nunziatina Burrello1, Enzo Vicari1, Paul Shin2, Ashok Agarwal2, Adele De Palma1, Caterina Grazioso1, Rosario D’Agata1 and Aldo E. Calogero1,3

1 Section of Endocrinology, Andrology and Internal Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy and 2 Center for Advanced Research in Human Reproduction, Infertility, and Sexual Function, Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Cattedra di Endocrinologia II, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Università di Catania, Ospedale Garibaldi, Piazza S. Maria di Gesù, 95123 Catania, Italy. e-mail: acaloger{at}unict.it

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients undergoing ICSI have been shown to have an increased sperm aneuploidy rate. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of sperm aneuploidy on ICSI outcome. METHODS: To accomplish this, 48 consecutive unselected male patients (median age 34 years) had their sperm aneuploidy rate evaluated in the same swim-up preparation used for ICSI. Chromosomes 8, 12, 18, X and Y were evaluated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Patients were divided into two groups (A and B) based on the sperm aneuploidy frequency in their sperm. Group A had values below and group B above the upper limit of normal [1.55%, determined in 14 healthy men (median age 25 years) with normal semen parameters by WHO 1999 criteria (control group)]. RESULTS: Group A consisted of 12 patients (25%) whose sperm aneuploidy rates fell below the cut-off value of the control group (median 1.25%; range 0.85–1.52). Group B consisted of the remaining 36 patients (75%), who had an elevated sperm aneuploidy rate (median 3.25%; range 1.64–23.60). Fertilization (93 versus 85%) and cleavage (100 versus 98%) rates were similar for both groups. Group A had significantly higher clinical pregnancy (75 versus 34%; P < 0.001) and implantation (34 versus 13%; P < 0.001) rates compared with group B. In addition, group A had a lower overall miscarriage rate (11.1 versus 38.9%). Other factors that affect pregnancy and implantation, such as patient age and conventional semen parameters, were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that chromosomally abnormal sperm have a negative impact on ICSI outcome.

Key words: abortion rate/ICSI/male infertility/pregnancy rate/sperm aneuploidy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sanchez-Castro, A.R. Jimenez-Macedo, M. Sandalinas, and J. Blanco
Prognostic value of sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis over PGD
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1516 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.D.M. Nicopoullos, C. Gilling-Smith, P.A. Almeida, S. Homa, L. Nice, H. Tempest, and J.W.A. Ramsay
The role of sperm aneuploidy as a predictor of the success of intracytoplasmic sperm injection?
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 240 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
G. Collodel and E. Moretti
Morphology and Meiotic Segregation in Spermatozoa From Men of Proven Fertility
J Androl, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 106 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. S. Suh, X. Zhu, N. Phadke, D. A. Ohl, S. Takayama, and G. D. Smith
IVF within microfluidic channels requires lower total numbers and lower concentrations of sperm
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 477 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, G. Cavallini, A. Crippa, M. Nadalini, L. Bernardini, G. F. Menchini Fabris, S. Voliani, and A. P. Ferraretti
Frequency of aneuploidy in sperm from patients with extremely severe male factor infertility
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2140 - 2152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
F. M. Petit, N. Frydman, M. Benkhalifa, A. Le Du, A. Aboura, R. Fanchin, R. Frydman, and G. Tachdjian
Could Sperm Aneuploidy Rate Determination Be Used as a Predictive Test Before Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection?
J Androl, March 1, 2005; 26(2): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Burrello, G. Arcidiacono, E. Vicari, P. Asero, D. Di Benedetto, A. De Palma, R. Romeo, R. D'Agata, and A. E. Calogero
Morphologically normal spermatozoa of patients with secretory oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia have an increased aneuploidy rate
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2298 - 2302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Aittomaki, U.-B. Wennerholm, C. Bergh, A. Selbing, J. Hazekamp, and K.-G. Nygren
Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: Should ICSI patients have genetic testing before treatment? A practical proposition to help patient information
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 472 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.