Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alvero, R.
Right arrow Articles by Segars, J.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alvero, R.
Right arrow Articles by Segars, J.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, No. 9, 1848-1852, September 2003
© 2003 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer*

R. Alvero1,4, R.M. Hearns-Stokes2,3, W.H. Catherino2,3, M.P. Leondires2 and J.H. Segars3

1 University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80010, 2 Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20003 and 3 Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch/National Institute of Child Health and Development/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Advanced Reproductive Medicine, Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 1635 N. Ursula Street, Mail Stop F701, Aurora, CO 80010, USA. e-mail: ruben.alvero{at}uchsc.edu

BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer (ET) influences pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproduction. Data are conflicting as to which variables affect ET success. This study examines variables that may affect outcome after ET in assisted reproductive technology patients who had high-quality embryos transferred. METHODS: Over a 23 month period, 669 consecutive cycles were examined. Only patients having grade I and grade II embryos, or blastocyst transfers, were included in this retrospective analysis. A total of 584 consecutive cycles met study criteria. At the time of ET, the following variables were recorded: aborted first attempt at ET; presence of blood and/or mucus in or on the transfer catheter after ET; ease of ET as judged by provider; need for mock embryo transfer immediately before the actual transfer and retention of embryos in the transfer catheter. These variables were retrospectively analysed for their impact on implantation rate (IR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). RESULTS: There were 290 gestations (49.7% CPR). Multiple attempts at ET, subjective difficulty of ET, performance of a sham pass immediately prior to embryo transfer, and presence of mucus on or in the catheter did not affect the CPR or IR. No difference was noted in the mean age of patients having or lacking any of these factors. There was a significant association between the presence of blood on or in the catheter and decreased IR (P = 0.015) and CPR (P = 0.004). Retained embryos also decreased IR (P = 0.03). Multivariable analysis confirmed that the presence of blood on the transfer catheter was the most important of these transfer characteristics in predicting IR (P = 0.042) and CPR (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that when only high-grade embryos or blastocysts are transferred, the presence of blood on the catheter is associated with decreased IR and CPR in assisted reproduction.

Key words: blood/embryo transfer technique/implantation/pregnancy rate/retained embryos

* The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the Authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Dessolle, T. Freour, P. Barriere, M. Jean, C. Ravel, E. Darai, and D. J. Biau
How soon can I be proficient in embryo transfer? Lessons from the cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM)
Hum. Reprod., November 18, 2009; (2009) dep391v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Coroleu, P. N. Barri, O. Carreras, I. Belil, R. Buxaderas, A. Veiga, and J. Balasch
Effect of using an echogenic catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in an IVF programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1809 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Marikinti and P. R. Brinsden
'The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer'
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 2029 - 2030.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.