Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsushita, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsushita, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 1, 59-64, January 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Effects of vitamin D and estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms on the changes in lumbar bone mineral density with multiple pregnancies in Japanese women

H. Matsushita, T. Kurabayashi1, M. Tomita and K. Tanaka

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University School of Medicine, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Niigata 951-8510, Japan

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: takumi{at}med.niigata-u.ac.jp

BACKGROUND: Our aims were to follow the longitudinal changes in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) with multiple pregnancies, and to study whether polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and estrogen receptor (ER) genes may influence the results. METHODS: We repeatedly measured the BMD of the lumbar spine (L2–L4) of 133 women who had undergone two successive pregnancies and 73 non-pregnant controls, and analysed the restriction fragment length polymorphisms using restriction endonucleases TaqI, ApaI and FokI for the VDR gene, and PvuII and XbaI for the ER gene. RESULTS: Cases and controls had no significant differences in the longitudinal BMD changes. The mean percentage change in lumbar BMD ({Delta}BMD%) of the women with the XX/Xx genotype was significantly lower than that of the women with the xx genotype after adjusting for age at each delivery, BMD of the first scan, and interval between the scans (0.2 ± 3.3 versus 2.0 ± 4.2%; P = 0.030, analysis of covariance). Multiple regression analyses to evaluate the contribution of the XbaI polymorphism of the ER gene on {Delta}BMD% showed that the percentage decrease in BMD was greater for women lacking the XbaI restriction site (adjusted R2 = 0.188, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the {Delta}BMD% was significantly influenced by the XbaI polymorphism of the ER gene.

Key words: bone mineral density/estrogen receptor/genetic polymorphism/pregnancy/vitamin D receptor


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
F. F. Bezerra, G. M. K. Cabello, L. M. C. Mendonca, and C. M. Donangelo
Bone Mass and Breast Milk Calcium Concentration Are Associated with Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms in Adolescent Mothers
J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 277 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Yahata, J. Quan, N. Tamura, H. Nagata, T. Kurabayashi, and K. Tanaka
Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of estrogen receptor {alpha} gene and efficacy of HRT on bone mineral density in post-menopausal Japanese women
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1860 - 1866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Gennari, D. Merlotti, V. De Paola, A. Calabro, L. Becherini, G. Martini, and R. Nuti
Estrogen Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and the Genetics of Osteoporosis: A HuGE Review
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2005; 161(4): 307 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.