Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gianotten, J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Veen, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gianotten, J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Veen, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 1, 71-76, January 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Familial clustering of impaired spermatogenesis: no evidence for a common genetic inheritance pattern

Judith Gianotten1,5, G.Henrike Westerveld1, Nico J. Leschot2, Michael W.T. Tanck3, Richard J. Lilford4, M.Paola Lombardi2 and Fulco van der Veen1

1 Center for Reproductive Medicine, 2 Department of Clinical Genetics and 3 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and 4 Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, UK

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, H4-205, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e-mail: J.Gianotten{at}amc.uva.nl

BACKGROUND: The aetiology of impaired spermatogenesis is unknown in the majority of cases. Evidence of a contribution of genetic factors is still scarce. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess whether male factor subfertility due to impaired spermatogenesis has a familial component and to test different genetic models of inheritance. METHODS: Cases were all men with severe idiopathic impaired spermatogenesis attending our fertility clinic from January 1998 until December 2001. Controls were all men with normozoospermia attending our fertility clinic in the same period. Family data were collected from the medical records and by additional interviews of the probands. If subfertility of a first-degree relative was mentioned, permission was sought to contact the affected family member in order to obtain all medical information available, including the results of semen analyses. RESULTS: In total, 160 patients and 285 controls were included in the analysis. Family size and number of brothers and sisters were equally distributed in both groups. In the patient group, 1.63% of the brothers who had tried to father a child were mentioned to be subfertile compared to 5.8% in the control group [odds ratio 3.18 (95% confidence interval 1.59–6.37)]. The subfertility among the brothers in the patient group was more often due to reduced semen parameters compared to the control group. The data did not fit with frequent autosomal dominant or recessive segregation. CONCLUSION: Male factor subfertility due to impaired spermatogenesis appears to cluster in families. Our data suggests that heritable genetic factors play a role in a limited number of cases. Impaired spermatogenesis is not caused by a common genetic defect, but is most likely a complex disease in which several different factors play a role.

Key words: familial clustering/impaired spermatogenesis/male subfertility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Joffe
What has happened to human fertility?
Hum. Reprod., November 19, 2009; (2009) dep390v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Kuzmin, K. Jarvi, K. Lo, L. Spencer, G. Y.C. Chow, G. Macleod, Q. Wang, and S. Varmuza
Identification of Potentially Damaging Amino Acid Substitutions Leading to Human Male Infertility
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2009; 81(2): 319 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A.H.D.M. Dam, I. Feenstra, J.R. Westphal, L. Ramos, R.J.T. van Golde, and J.A.M. Kremer
Globozoospermia revisited
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 63 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Gianotten, M.P. Lombardi, A.H. Zwinderman, R. J. Lilford, and F. van der Veen
Idiopathic impaired spermatogenesis: genetic epidemiology is unlikely to provide a short-cut to better understanding
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2004; 10(6): 533 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. J. T. van Golde, I. A. M. van der Avoort, J. H. A. M. Tuerlings, L. A. Kiemeney, E. J. H. Meuleman, D. D. M. Braat, and J. A. M. Kremer
Phenotypic Characteristics of Male Subfertility and Its Familial Occurrence
J Androl, September 1, 2004; 25(5): 819 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
G.H. Westerveld, J. Gianotten, N.J. Leschot, F. van derVeen, S. Repping, and M.P. Lombardi
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein G-T (HNRNP G-T) mutations in men with impaired spermatogenesis
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 10(4): 265 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.