Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 22, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(10):2200-2205; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh415
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/10/2200    most recent
deh415v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dal Prato, L.
Right arrow Articles by Flamigni, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dal Prato, L.
Right arrow Articles by Flamigni, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 10 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

Half-dose depot triptorelin in pituitary suppression for multiple ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology: a randomized study*

L. Dal Prato1, A. Borini1,3, G. Coticchio1, M. Cattoli1 and C. Flamigni2

1 Tecnobios Procreazione, Center for Reproductive Health, Via Dante 15, I-40125 Bologna, Italy and 2 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: borini{at}tecnobios.it

BACKGROUND: Pituitary suppression by depot GnRH agonist may be excessive for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology. This study compares the efficacy of standard and half-dose depot triptorelin in a long protocol. METHODS: A total of 180 patients were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (90 patients) with half-dose (1.87 mg) triptorelin depot in the mid-luteal phase of their menstrual cycle, and in group 2 (90 patients) with full-dose (3.75 mg) triptorelin. RESULTS: There was no premature LH surge, with LH levels being lower in the full-dose group (1.04±0.05 versus 0.7±0.06 IU/l on the day of hCG). The number of FSH ampoules used was lower in group 1 (42±2 versus 59±3). The numbers of mature oocytes (10.1±0.54 versus 7.4±0.55), of fertilized oocytes (8.24±0.35 versus 6.34±0.37) and of embryos (7.8±0.36 versus 5.9±0.37) were significantly higher in group 1. No significant differences were found in pregnancy (38.8 versus 25.3%), implantation (22.6 versus 13.8%) or abortion (6.1 versus 5.0%) rates. Cumulative pregnancy (fresh plus frozen embryo transfers: 56.8 versus 35.4%) rate was significantly higher in group 1. CONCLUSION: A half-dose of depot triptorelin can be successfully used in ovarian stimulation for IVF and produce a higher number of good quality embryos with a good chance of implantation.

Key words: GnRH-agonist/half-dose/IVF/ovarian stimulation/triptorelin

* Presented in part at the 18th Annual Meeting of ESHRE, June 30–July 3, 2002, Vienna, Austria


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Safdarian, F. S. Mohammadi, A. Alleyassin, M. Aghahosseini, A. Meysamie, and E. Rahimi
Clinical outcome with half-dose depot triptorelin is the same as reduced-dose daily buserelin in a long protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation for ICSI/embryo transfer: a randomized double-blind clinical trial (NCT00461916)
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2449 - 2454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Isikoglu, S. Ozdem, M. Berkkanoglu, H. Jamal, Z. Senturk, and K. Ozgur
Single-dose depot leuprolide is as efficient as daily short-acting leuprolide in ICSI cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1657 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.