Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on September 30, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(11):2537-2544; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh475
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/11/2537    most recent
deh475v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonnell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vermeiden, J. P.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonnell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vermeiden, J. P.W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 11 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

The place of the crossover design in infertility trials: a maximum likelihood approach

Joseph McDonnell1,2,3, Angelique J. Goverde2 and Jan P.W. Vermeiden2

1 Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam and 2 Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Fertility, Institute for Endocrinology, Reproduction and Metabolism, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Fertility, Institute for Endocrinology, Reproduction and Metabolism, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, 1081 AV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: j.mcdonnell{at}vumc.nl

BACKGROUND: For some years, there has been a debate as to the place of the crossover trial in assisted reproduction technology (ART). We aimed to investigate whether crossover and parallel designs result in different estimates of treatment effects. METHODS: We carried out computer simulation of cohorts of patients undergoing either intra-uterine insemination (IUI) or IVF under both parallel and crossover designs, under scenarios involving censoring and carryover effects. Results of the simulation were analysed using a maximum likelihood approach. RESULTS: No relevant difference was found between the designs. The crossover design resulted in slightly more pregnancies than the parallel design. Carryover effects may slightly distort the estimates of treatment effects. Crossover and parallel designs will produce essentially the same statistical estimates of treatment effect and percentage of pregnancies. The crossover design is an acceptable design in infertility research provided the data are analysed correctly.

Key words: carryover effects/crossover design/infertility/maximum likelihood estimation/parallel design


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail
Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.