Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on March 25, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/5/1105    most recent
deh209v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, E.G.
Right arrow Articles by Thorpe, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, E.G.
Right arrow Articles by Thorpe, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1105-1109, May 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

A multicentre randomized controlled trial of expectant management versus IVF in women with Fallopian tube patency

E.G. Hughes1,7, M.L. Beecroft1, V. Wilkie2, L. Burville1, P. Claman2, I. Tummon3, E. Greenblatt4, M. Fluker5 and K. Thorpe6

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and 6 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Western Ontario, London, 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario and 5 Genesis Fertility Centre Incorporated, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

7 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University Medical Centre, 1200 Main Street West, Room 4D14, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. Email: hughese{at}mcmaster.ca

BACKGROUND: Although observational studies suggest that IVF is more effective than no treatment for women with Fallopian tube patency, this has not been tested rigorously in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: Eligible consenting couples planning their first treatment cycle in five Canadian fertility clinics received either IVF, within 90 days of randomization, or a period of 90 days with no treatment. Random allocation was stratified by female age and sperm quality, and administered using numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Follow-up assessed live birth and associated morbidity. RESULTS: Sixty-eight couples were randomized to a first cycle of IVF and 71 couples had 3 months without treatment. The live birth rates were 20/68 (29%) and 1/71 (1%), respectively. The single delivery in the untreated group was of twins, as were six of the 20 IVF deliveries (30%). An average of 2.0 embryos were transferred and no triplet pregnancies resulted. The relative likelihood of delivery after allocation to IVF was 20.9-fold higher than after allocation to no treatment [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8–155]. The presence of abnormal sperm did not reduce this likelihood. Treating four women (95% CI 3–6) with one cycle of IVF is required to achieve a single additional birth. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a valid and up-to-date comparison for policy makers and patients as they make choices around IVF, accurately measuring and confirming a major benefit from treatment.

Key words: effectiveness/IVF/treatment-independent pregnancy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. Nisker
Socially based discrimination against clinically appropriate care
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 10, 2009; 181(10): 764 - 764.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Intrauterine insemination
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2009; 15(3): 265 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, C.O. Hougaard, A. Nyboe Andersen, D. Molbo, and L. Schmidt
Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1338 couples initiating infertility treatment
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 991 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Yakin and B. Urman
What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A clinician's perspective
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1686 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J.C. Eijkemans, A.M.E. Lintsen, C.C. Hunault, C.A.M. Bouwmans, L. Hakkaart, D.D.M. Braat, and J.D.F. Habbema
Pregnancy chances on an IVF/ICSI waiting list: a national prospective cohort study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1627 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.M.E. Lintsen, P.C.M. Pasker-de Jong, E.J. de Boer, C.W. Burger, C.A.M. Jansen, D.D.M. Braat, F.E. van Leeuwen, and on behalf of the OMEGA project group
Effects of subfertility cause, smoking and body weight on the success rate of IVF
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1867 - 1875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E. V. Younglai, A. C. Holloway, and W. G. Foster
Environmental and occupational factors affecting fertility and IVF success
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 43 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gnoth
Comment on 'A multicentre randomized controlled trial of expectant management versus IVF in women with Fallopian tube patency'
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2428 - 2429.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. G. Hughes
Comment on 'A multicentre randomized controlled trial of expectant management versus IVF in women with Fallopian tube patency'
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2429 - 2429.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.