Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on April 22, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1245-1249,
June 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Clinical andrologystill a major problem in the treatment of infertility
Joondalup Health Campus, Shenton Avenue, Joondalup, Western Australia. 6027, Australia. e-mail ajequier@bigpond.net.au
This paper highlights the need for formal training in andrology amongst those clinicians who are today managing the problem of infertility in the male. As all infertility now appears to be treated mainly by gynaecologists who have often had no teaching in the subject of andrology, suggestions are made as to how this situation can be improved and rectified. Specific training is needed for those gynaecologists involved in the management of male infertility and it is urged that training courses in clinical andrology are set up for this purpose.
Key words: clinical andrology/male infertility
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bungum, P. Humaidan, A. Axmon, M. Spano, L. Bungum, J. Erenpreiss, and A. Giwercman Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 174 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Seli and D. Sakkas Spermatozoal nuclear determinants of reproductive outcome: implications for ART Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2005; 11(4): 337 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

