Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on April 29, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/6/1476    most recent
deh283v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Neubourg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Elseviers, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Neubourg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Elseviers, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1476-1479, June 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome

D. De Neubourg1,3, J. Gerris1, K. Mangelschots1, E. Van Royen1, M. Vercruyssen1 and M. Elseviers2

1 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp and 2 Department of Microbiology, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: Diane.deneubourg{at}zna.be

BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (particularly of a top quality embryo) is an excellent model to correlate embryo quality in terms of morphological criteria to early pregnancy. We investigated whether this model could provide us with more information on what happens after implantation in the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: The outcome of 370 consecutive single top quality embryo transfers in patients younger than 38 years was analysed for pregnancy and first-trimester pregnancy loss (FTPL) before 13 weeks of gestation. Analysis was done on each cohort of embryos from which the transferred top quality embryo was selected. Serum HCG levels were measured on day 8 and day 12 after day 3 embryo transfer. The HCG index was calculated as the level of HCG on day 12/HCG on day 8. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate after single top quality embryo transfer was 51.9%. This was independent of the patients’ age. FTPL, however, appeared to be age dependent: 15.4% for the whole group, 9% in patients younger than 30 years and 19% in patients above 30 years. The pregnancy rate was 50% in IVF cycles and 52% in ICSI cycles; FTPL was 19% in IVF cycles and 10% in ICSI cycles. Multiple regression analysis showed that these differences originated from age differences between both populations rather than from technique-related factors. An HCG level ≥45 IU/l on day 12 was predictive for ongoing pregnancy with 75.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity; an HCG index ≥3.5 similarly predicted ongoing pregnancy with 72.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that embryo selection for transfer on day 3 can be used as an excellent tool for prediction of pregnancy but not for prediction of FTPL. The pregnancy rate of a single top quality embryo is not related to age, whereas FTPL is age dependent.

Key words: assisted reproduction/early pregnancy/single embryo transfer/top quality embryo


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hamel, I. Dufort, C. Robert, C. Gravel, M.-C. Leveille, A. Leader, and M.-A. Sirard
Identification of differentially expressed markers in human follicular cells associated with competent oocytes
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1118 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Veleva, A. Tiitinen, S. Vilska, C. Hyden-Granskog, C. Tomas, H. Martikainen, and J. S. Tapanainen
High and low BMI increase the risk of miscarriage after IVF/ICSI and FET
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 878 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Veleva, S. Vilska, C. Hyden-Granskog, A. Tiitinen, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen
Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2098 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg and J. Gerris
What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go?
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 843 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, A. Steylemans, and M. Elseviers
The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. van Montfoort, A. A.A. Fiddelers, J.M. Janssen, J. G. Derhaag, C. D. Dirksen, G. A.J. Dunselman, J. A. Land, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 338 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Thurin, T. Hardarson, J. Hausken, B. Jablonowska, K. Lundin, A. Pinborg, and C. Bergh
Predictors of ongoing implantation in IVF in a good prognosis group of patients
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1876 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.