Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bisioli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bisioli, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1495-1496, June 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Reply to a further note on the sex ratios of births conceived during wartime

Claudio Bisioli

Instituto de Ginecología y Fertilidad, M.T. de Alvear 2259, C1122AAI Buenos Aires, Argentina

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

I thank Professor James for his letter on sex ratio biases after wartime (Bisioli, 2004Go; Zorn, 2004Go) focusing on proximate (physiological) versus ultimate (evolutionary) explanations and the length of the sex ratio biases.

    Plausible proximate . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?