Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on May 13, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Human Reproduction, Vol. 19, No. 7, 1598-1603,
July 2004
© 2004 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage
1 St Luke Clinic, 5, Tsumori-Tomioka, Oita City 870-0947 and 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1 Idaigaoka, Hasamacho, 879-5593, Oita Prefecture, Japan
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: st-luke{at}oct-net.ne.jp
BACKGROUND: Recently, advances in human IVF-embryo transfer (ET) have been reported using sequential media and blastocyst stage ET. In our previous report, using a prospective, randomized study, no advantage was found using the blastocyst stage ET compared with day 3 ET. This study was performed in order to evaluate implantation and pregnancy rates of hatching blastocyst stage ET compared with conventional day 3 ET. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 480 patient cycles were evaluated using a prospective, randomized study. The pregnancy rate and implantation rate were compared between the day 3 ET (n = 240) and hatching blastocyst stage ET (Hat ET; n = 240). The Hat ET group had a pregnancy rate of 29.3% (55 out of 188) and an implantation rate of 21.4% (67 out of 313). The day 3 ET group had a pregnancy rate of 29.2% (70 out of 240) and an implantation rate of 19.1% (93 out of 488). In the Hat ET group, the pregnancy rate, implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate of day 5 ET and day 6 ET were all higher than the respective rates in the day 79 ET group. CONCLUSION: We found that the pregnancy rate and implantation rate of ET with hatching stage blastocysts had no advantage compared with the conventional day 3 ET.
Key words: blastocyst culture/embryo transfer/hatching stage/pregnancy rate
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. G. Papanikolaou, E. M. Kolibianakis, H. Tournaye, C. A Venetis, H. Fatemi, B. Tarlatzis, and P. Devroey Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 91 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

