Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 8, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(9):1943-1945; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh392
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/9/1943    most recent
deh392v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wennerholm, U.B.
Right arrow Articles by Bergh, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wennerholm, U.B.
Right arrow Articles by Bergh, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 9 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?

Singleton live births should also include preterm births

U.B. Wennerholm1 and C. Bergh

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for the Health of Women and Children, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, East, 416 85 Göteborg, Sweden

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: wennerholm{at}swipnet.se

An intensive debate is ongoing in this journal concerning the most appropriate endpoint after assisted reproduction techniques. The endpoint suggested by the first authors was Birth Emphasizing a Successful Singleton at Term (BESST). We have evaluated the most appropriate endpoint from different perspectives: patients, public, health authorities, obstetric and IVF clinics. We find singleton live birth highly relevant as an outcome parameter as multiple pregnancies are the main factor responsible for the overall poorer obstetric and neonatal outcome in IVF pregnancies, and multiple pregnancies are mostly an avoidable iatrogenic complication. However, our proposal is that both preterm and term singletons should be included since the prematurity rate is an outcome that is largely uninfluenced by the IVF clinics. In conclusion, we propose singleton live birth per cycle initiated as the most appropriate main outcome after assisted reproduction. Prematurity should in addition be reported separately as a secondary outcome.

Key words: assisted reproduction/outcome/success rate


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. T. Kjellberg, P. Carlsson, and C. Bergh
Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 210 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.