Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on June 10, 2004
Human Reproduction 2004 19(9):2027-2030; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh366
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/9/2027    most recent
deh366v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matorras, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Escudero, F.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matorras, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rodriguez-Escudero, F.J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 9 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

Influence of the time interval between embryo catheter loading and discharging on the success of IVF

R. Matorras, R. Mendoza, A. Expósito and F.J. Rodriguez-Escudero

Human Reproductive Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, País Vasco University, Hospital from Cruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain

Author whom correspondence should be addressed at: María Diaz de Haro 7, 6iz. 48013 Bilbao, Spain. Fax: 34 946006476; Email: rmatorras{at}hcru.osakidetza.net

BACKGROUND: To ascertain the influence of the duration of the ‘interval loading-discharging embryos’ (ILDE) on the results of embryo transfer. METHODS:The population under study consisted of 450 consecutive fresh embryo transfers. ILDE was measured in all transfers. Pregnancy and implantation rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Conceptional cycles had a lower (mean ±SD) ILDE than non conceptional cycles (53.5±43.6 s vs 63.7±49.3). When only easy transfers—defined as those not requiring cervical tenaculum—were considered, similar differences were observed. The following pregnancy rates were obtained according ILDE duration: 38.9% (ILDE <30 s), 33.2% (ILDE 31–60), 31.6% (ILDE 61–120) and 19.1% (ILDE >120) (P<0.05). When only easy transfers were considered, similar results were obtained: 40.0%, 33.3%, 32.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Similar results were observed regarding implantation rates regarding the whole population (21.2%, 15.4%, 15.9% and 9.4%, respectively; P<0.01) as well as when only easy transfers were considered. CONCLUSIONS: ILDE duration is a prognostic factor of pregnancy rate and of implantation rate in IVF. The longer the ILDE duration, the lower the pregnancy and implantation rates. The decrease in pregnancy and implantation rates is gradual until an ILDE of 120 s, and decreases sharply afterwards. It is recommended to speed up the embryo transfer process, wherever possible. ILDE >120 s carries a poor prognosis and should, when possible, be avoided.

Key words: embryo transfer/implantation rate/interval loading-discharging embryos/prognostic factors/time


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
O. Ramon, R. Matorras, B. Corcostegui, A. Meabe, J. Burgos, A. Exposito, and L. Crisol
Ultrasound-guided artificial insemination: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1080 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
B. Coroleu, P. N. Barri, O. Carreras, I. Belil, R. Buxaderas, A. Veiga, and J. Balasch
Effect of using an echogenic catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in an IVF programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1809 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.