Skip Navigation

Human Reproduction 2004 19(9):2171; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh376
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kwee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schoemaker, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kwee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schoemaker, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 19 no. 9 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

Reply: Variability of ovarian reserve tests

J. Kwee*, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, C.B. Lambalk and J. Schoemaker

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Fertility and the IVF Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

* Email: j.kwee@vumc.nl

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Sir,

We thank Dr Elter et al. for their comments concerning our paper on intercyclical variability of ovarian reserve tests.

The authors raise the issue of possible differences between day 2 and day 3 FSH values which in our study may have contributed to the observed variation of FSH between cycles. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?