Skip Navigation

Human Reproduction 2005 20(12):3571-3572; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei224
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pennings, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pennings, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Letter to the editor

Reply: Reproductive exile versus reproductive tourism

Guido Pennings

Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

E-mail: Guido.Pennings@Ugent.be

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Sir,

Concepts, like definitions, play a crucial role in debates. The original term ‘medical tourism’ was used when people went on vacation to exotic places and took advantage of the opportunity to obtain some medical treatment. Tourism . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?