Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on January 21, 2005
Human Reproduction 2005 20(2):323-327; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh744
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/323    most recent
deh744v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergh, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bergh, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction vol. 20 no. 2 © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

MINI-REVIEW: DEVELOPMENTS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE

Single embryo transfer: a mini-review

Christina Bergh1

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute for Health of Women and Children, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

Email: christina.bergh{at}vgregion.se

This paper provides a concise review of single embryo transfer (SET) in cycles using fresh embryos as well as in cycles using frozen–thawed embryos. Relevant studies were identified by a computerized search in PubMed for the period 1995–2004. The pregnancy rates, delivery rates and multiple pregnancy/birth rates were evaluated after fresh or frozen embryo transfer as well as cumulative delivery rates after fresh and frozen SET. The results of four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and seven observational studies using fresh embryo transfers are analysed. No RCT with SET in freezing–thawing cycles was identified, while one observational study was identified. The effects of a change in the rules from the National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden in 2003 regarding the implementation of SET in Sweden are summarized.

Key words: frozen embryo transfer/multiple pregnancy/pregnancy rates/randomized controlled trials/single embryo transfer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Bechoua, K. Astruc, S. Thouvenot, S. Girod, A. Chiron, C. Jimenez, and P. Sagot
How to demonstrate that eSET does not compromise the likelihood of having a baby?
Hum. Reprod., September 13, 2009; (2009) dep321v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, M.H. Saussereau, V. Cadoret, C. Jamet, and D. Royere
Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1051 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
G. M. Jones, D. S. Cram, B. Song, G. Kokkali, K. Pantos, and A. O. Trounson
Novel strategy with potential to identify developmentally competent IVF blastocysts
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1748 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. van Montfoort, A. A.A. Fiddelers, J. A. Land, C. D. Dirksen, J. L. Severens, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1669 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
P. Donoso, W. Verpoest, E.G. Papanikolaou, I. Liebaers, H.M. Fatemi, K. Sermon, C. Staessen, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey
Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1021 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
A.S. Lopes, S.E. Madsen, N.B. Ramsing, P. Lovendahl, T. Greve, and H. Callesen
Investigation of respiration of individual bovine embryos produced in vivo and in vitro and correlation with viability following transfer
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 558 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A.A.A. Fiddelers, J.L. Severens, C.D. Dirksen, J.C.M. Dumoulin, J.A. Land, and J.L.H. Evers
Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 5 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
N. Gleicher and D. Barad
The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1337 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
R. Tang, J. Catt, and D. Howlett
Towards defining parameters for a successful single embryo transfer in frozen cycles
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1179 - 1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg and J. Gerris
What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go?
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 843 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
E. G. Papanikolaou, M. Camus, E. M. Kolibianakis, L. Van Landuyt, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos.
N. Engl. J. Med., March 16, 2006; 354(11): 1139 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.