Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on February 2, 2005
Human Reproduction 2005 20(3):774-781; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh671
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/774    most recent
deh671v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bahadur, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ralph, D.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bahadur, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ralph, D.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Vol. 20 No. 3 © The Author 2005; all rights reserved

Semen quality before and after gonadotoxic treatment

G. Bahadur1,4, O. Ozturk2, A. Muneer3, R. Wafa1, A. Ashraf1, N. Jaman1, S. Patel1, A.W. Oyede1 and D.J. Ralph3

1 Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Laboratories, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College Hospitals Trust, Rosenheim Building, 25 Grafton Way, London WC1E 6DB, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, 88–96 Chenies Mews, London WC1E 6DB and 3 Middlesex Hospital, The Institute of Urology and Nephrology (St Peters Hospital), London W1N 8AA, UK

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: g.bahadur{at}ucl.ac.uk

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyse the semen quality of patients before and after gonadotoxic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated semen quality in 314 patients over a 26 year period. The diagnostic categories were leukaemia (n=13); lymphoma (n=128); testicular cancer (n=102); benign conditions (n=13); and other malignant neoplasms (n=58). The degree of azoospermia or oligozoospermia for each disease category was recorded. We then analysed the recovery in semen quality over time for each disease category. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 27.9 years (range 13–65 years). A total of 1115 post-treatment semen samples were analysed from 314 patients. There was a significant reduction in the post-treatment sperm concentration, sperm motility and semen volume compared with pre-treatment levels (P<0.05) in the entire cohort. However, the sperm movement and motility grade remained unaffected. Patients with testicular carcinoma had the lowest pre-treatment sperm concentrations but also the lowest incidence of azoospermia after cancer treatment. Patients with lymphoma and leukaemia had the highest incidence of post-treatment azoospermia and oligospermia. Patients having the largest reductions in their sperm concentration after treatment required the longest recovery period for spermatogenesis. The diagnostic category was the only significant predictor of post-treatment azoospermia. CONCLUSION: Gonadotoxic treatment results in a significant reduction in sperm quality. The type of cancer or disease, and the pre-treatment sperm concentrations were found to be the most significant factors governing post-treatment semen quality and recovery of spermatogenesis. All categories of patients displayed varying degrees of azoospermia and oligozoospermia, and recovery of gonadal function from these states was not significant. This highlights the importance of ensuring sperm banking before treatment, including for patients with benign conditions. Several factors and associations are discussed further in order to give an insight into the pre- and post-gonadotoxic treatment effects.

Key words: azoospermia/cancer/gonadotoxicity/oligozoospermia/quality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Cvancarova, S. O. Samuelsen, H. Magelssen, and S. D. Fossa
Reproduction Rates After Cancer Treatment: Experience From the Norwegian Radium Hospital
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2009; 27(3): 334 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Menon, N. Rives, N. Mousset-Simeon, L. Sibert, J.P. Vannier, S. Mazurier, L. Masse, V. Duchesne, and B. Mace
Fertility preservation in adolescent males: experience over 22 years at Rouen University Hospital
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 37 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
F. Vaisheva, G. Delbes, B. F. Hales, and B. Robaire
Effects of the Chemotherapeutic Agents for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CHOP), on the Male Rat Reproductive System and Progeny Outcome
J Androl, July 1, 2007; 28(4): 578 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gandini, P. Sgro, F. Lombardo, D. Paoli, F. Culasso, L. Toselli, P. Tsamatropoulos, and A. Lenzi
Effect of chemo- or radiotherapy on sperm parameters of testicular cancer patients
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2882 - 2889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.