Skip Navigation

Human Reproduction 2005 20(6):1746; doi:10.1093/humrep/deh693
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scriven, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scriven, P. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for an insertional translocation

Paul N. Scriven

Department of Cytogenetics and Centre for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas Street, London, SE1 9RT, UK

Email: Paul.Scriven@gstt.sthames.nhs.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Sir,

Melotte et al. (2004)Go present two unsuccessful cycles of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for a couple where the female partner carries an interchromosomal insertional translocation of part of the long arm of chromosome 2 into the long arm of chromosome 14. The authors present an elegant proof showing that it may be necessary to incorporate up to four probes into . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?