Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on August 25, 2005
Human Reproduction 2006 21(1):159-163; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei270
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/159    most recent
dei270v3
dei270v2
dei270v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silberstein, T.
Right arrow Articles by Blazar, A.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silberstein, T.
Right arrow Articles by Blazar, A.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Müllerian inhibiting substance levels at the time of HCG administration in IVF cycles predict both ovarian reserve and embryo morphology

T. Silberstein1, D.T. MacLaughlin3, I. Shai4, J.R. Trimarchi1, G. Lambert-Messerlian2, D.B. Seifer5, D.L. Keefe1 and A.S. Blazar1,6

1 Women and Infants’ Hospital of Rhode Island, Brown University Division of Biology and Medicine, and 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Prenatal and Special Testing, Providence, Rhode Island, 3 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 4 Departments of Epidemiology and Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts and 5 Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA

6 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Division of Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Women and Infants’ Hospital of Rhode Island, 101 Dudley Street, Suite 1440, Providence, RI 02905, USA. E-mail: Ablazar{at}wihri.org

BACKGROUND: Pre-antral and early antral follicles secrete Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS), suggesting that MIS may directly reflect ovarian reserve. Since little is known about how ovarian reserve affects oocyte quality, we attempt here to assess the predictive value of MIS on embryo morphology and IVF outcome. To do so, we measured MIS at the time of HCG administration 36 h prior to oocyte retrieval. METHODS: A total of 257 patients undergoing IVF were prospectively recruited. We measured MIS levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at the time of HCG, and compared the MIS values to day 3 FSH levels in the prediction of embryo morphology and IVF outcome. RESULTS: The distribution of MIS levels was skewed, with a median of 2.7 ng/ml (range 0 to 28.5 ng/ml). MIS values at the time of HCG administration inversely correlated with basal FSH levels (P = 0.002), and both correlated significantly with patient age, number of mature follicles, number of oocytes retrieved and serum estradiol levels. MIS levels correlated significantly with a greater number of 6-cell embryos and better embryo morphology score, while basal FSH levels did not correlate with these outcome variables. MIS levels >2.7 ng/ml portended improved oocyte quality as reflected in a higher implantation rate (P = 0.001) and a trend toward a better clinical pregnancy rate (P = 0.084). CONCLUSIONS: MIS levels seem to predict not only ovarian reserve, but also embryo morphology. Measurement of MIS at the time of HCG administration may, therefore, in the future improve management of patients undergoing treatments with assisted reproductive technology.

Key words: embryo morphology/IVF/Müllerian inhibiting substance/ovarian reserve/pregnancy rate


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. La Marca, G. Sighinolfi, D. Radi, C. Argento, E. Baraldi, A. C. Artenisio, G. Stabile, and A. Volpe
Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART)
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 30, 2009; (2009) dmp036v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. La Marca, F.J. Broekmans, A. Volpe, B.C. Fauser, N.S. Macklon, and on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for
Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2264 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Lie Fong, J.S.E. Laven, F.G.A.J. Hakvoort-Cammel, I. Schipper, J.A. Visser, A.P.N. Themmen, F.H. de Jong, and M.M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
Assessment of ovarian reserve in adult childhood cancer survivors using anti-Mullerian hormone
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 982 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Fanchin, D. H. Mendez Lozano, N. Frydman, A. Gougeon, N. di Clemente, R. Frydman, and J. Taieb
Anti-Mullerian Hormone Concentrations in the Follicular Fluid of the Preovulatory Follicle Are Predictive of the Implantation Potential of the Ensuing Embryo Obtained by in Vitro Fertilization
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1796 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. La Marca, S. Giulini, A. Tirelli, E. Bertucci, T. Marsella, S. Xella, and A. Volpe
Anti-Mullerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 766 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sanchez, P. Alama, B. Gadea, S.R. Soares, C. Simon, and A. Pellicer
Fresh human orthotopic ovarian cortex transplantation: long-term results
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 786 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Al-Qahtani and N. P. Groome
Anti-Mullerian Hormone: Cinderella Finds New Admirers.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3760 - 3762.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Ebner, M. Sommergruber, M. Moser, O. Shebl, E. Schreier-Lechner, and G. Tews
Basal level of anti-Mullerian hormone is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2022 - 2026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.