Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on September 19, 2005
Human Reproduction 2006 21(1):90-94; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei293
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/90    most recent
dei293v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarlatzis, B.
Right arrow Articles by Shoham, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarlatzis, B.
Right arrow Articles by Shoham, Z.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

The use of recombinant human LH (lutropin alfa) in the late stimulation phase of assisted reproduction cycles: a double-blind, randomized, prospective study

B. Tarlatzis4,7, E. Tavmergen5, M. Szamatowicz6, A. Barash1, A. Amit2, E. Levitas3 and Z. Shoham1

1 Kaplan Medical Centre, Division of Infertility, In vitro Fertilization Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rehovot 76100, 2 Tel Aviv Medical Centre, Ein Dor 15, Hakyria 61070 and 3 Soroka Medical Centre, IVF Unit, Beer-Sheva, Israel, 4 Unit for Human Reproduction, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and Infertility & IVF Centre, Geniki Kliniki, Thessaloníki, Greece, 5 Ege University Family Planning – Infertility (IVF) Research and Treatment Centre, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey, and 6 Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Academy of Bialystok, 15–276 Bialystok, Poland

7 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tarlatzis{at}hol.gr

BACKGROUND: The effect of recombinant human LH (r-hLH; lutropin alfa) in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) prior to IVF was investigated. METHODS: After down-regulation with the GnRH agonist, buserelin, 114 normo-ovulatory women (aged 18–37 years) received r-hFSH alone until the lead follicle reached a diameter of 14 mm. Patients were then randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive r-hFSH in addition to r-hLH, 75 IU s.c., or placebo daily for a maximum of 10 days prior to oocyte retrieval and IVF. The primary end-point was the number of metaphase II oocytes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between treatment groups for the primary end-point. Serum estradiol concentrations on the day of HCG administration were significantly higher in the group receiving r-hLH plus r-hFSH than in the group receiving r-hFSH alone (P = 0.0001), but there were no significant differences between the groups in dose and duration of r-hFSH treatment required, oocyte maturation, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate and live birth rate. CONCLUSION: In this patient population, the addition of r-hLH during the late follicular phase of a long GnRH agonist and r-hFSH stimulation cycle provides no further benefit in terms of oocyte maturation or other end-points.

Key words: FSH/IVF/LH/ovarian stimulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. NyboeAndersen, P. Humaidan, G. Fried, J. Hausken, L. Antila, S. Bangsboll, P.E. Rasmussen, S. Lindenberg, H. E. Bredkjaer, H. Meinertz, et al.
Recombinant LH supplementation to recombinant FSH during the final days of controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. A multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 427 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. I. Durnerin, K. Erb, R. Fleming, H. Hillier, S.G. Hillier, C.M. Howles, J.-N. Hugues, A. Lass, H. Lyall, P. Rasmussen, et al.
Effects of recombinant LH treatment on folliculogenesis and responsiveness to FSH stimulation
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 421 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, L. Kalogeropoulou, G. Griesinger, E.G. Papanikolaou, J. Papadimas, J. Bontis, and B.C. Tarlatzis
Among patients treated with FSH and GnRH analogues for in vitro fertilization, is the addition of recombinant LH associated with the probability of live birth? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2007; 13(5): 445 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.