Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on July 14, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(11):2996-3000; doi:10.1093/humrep/del276
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/11/2996    most recent
del276v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garbin, O.
Right arrow Articles by Vayssiere, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garbin, O.
Right arrow Articles by Vayssiere, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Vaginoscopic versus conventional approaches to outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy: a two-centre randomized prospective study

O. Garbin1,3, R. Kutnahorsky2, J.L. Göllner2 and C. Vayssiere1

1 Service de Gynécologie, SIHCUS-CMCO, Schiltigheim and 2 Service de Gynécologie, CME Le Parc, Colmar, France

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Service de Gynécologie, SIHCUS-CMCO, 19, rue Louis Pasteur, 67303, Schiltigheim, France. E-mail: olivier.garbin{at}sihcus.fr

BACKGROUND: To compare the tolerability and feasibility of the transvaginal and standard approaches in outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy. METHODS: This randomized prospective trial was carried out in two centres to compare the transvaginal (n = 200) and conventional (n = 200) approaches during outpatient hysteroscopy. Patients were randomized by a computer-generated list. The main outcome measure was pain during the examination, measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) graded from 0 to 10 (0 = lowest, 10 = highest). Secondary criteria were ease of instrument passage through the cervix, investigation quality and its duration. For data analysis, we used the chi-squared test or Fischer’s exact test for qualitative variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for quantitative variables. RESULTS: Median VAS was rated at 0.5 for the vaginoscopic and 2 for the standard (P < 0.0001) approaches. The approaches did not differ significantly in investigation quality, procedure duration or ease of cervical passage (although the latter was more often easy transvaginally). CONCLUSIONS: The transvaginal approach is better tolerated than the conventional technique in outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy.

Key words: feasibility/outpatient hysteroscopy/tolerability/vaginoscopic approach


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Bosteels, S. Weyers, P. Puttemans, C. Panayotidis, B. Van Herendael, V. Gomel, B. W.J. Mol, C. Mathieu, and T. D'Hooghe
The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 10, 2009; (2009) dmp033v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.