Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on October 20, 2005
Human Reproduction 2006 21(2):512-517; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei346
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/2/512    most recent
dei346v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Coticchio, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borini, A.
Right arrow Articles by Coticchio, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Clinical outcome of oocyte cryopreservation after slow cooling with a protocol utilizing a high sucrose concentration

A. Borini1,3, R. Sciajno1, V. Bianchi1, E. Sereni1, C. Flamigni2 and G. Coticchio1

1 Tecnobios Procreazione, Via Dante 15 and 2 University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: borini{at}tecnobiosprocreazione.it

BACKGROUND: Recently, interest in oocyte cryopreservation has steadily increased. Newly developed protocols have dramatically improved survival rates, removing perhaps the major hurdle that has prevented this approach from becoming a fully established form of treatment. However, the clinical efficiency of these protocols has not been exhaustively explored and therefore remains controversial. METHODS: Morphologically normal oocytes displaying the first polar body were frozen–thawed with a slow cooling protocol that utilized 1.5 mol/l propane-1,2-diol (PrOH) and 0.3 mol/l sucrose. RESULTS: A total of 927 oocytes from 146 patients were frozen–thawed, achieving a 74.1% survival rate. Over 76% of microinjected oocytes displayed two pronuclei 16 h post-insemination, while the proportion of embryos at 44–46 h post-insemination was 90.2%. At this time point, the majority (68.3%) of embryos were at the two-cell stage, showing in most cases (78.7%) minimal or moderate fragmentation. Eighteen clinical pregnancies, three of which were twin, were observed, giving rise to rates of 12.3 and 9.7%, calculated per patient and per embryo transfer, respectively.The implantation rate was 5.2%. To date, four children have been born and three pregnancies resulted in spontaneous abortions, while the remaining pregnancies are ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that although the combination of slow cooling and high sucrose concentration ensures high rates of oocyte survival, it is not sufficient to guarantee a high standard of clinical efficiency.

Key words: cryopreservation/fertility preservation/oocytes/pregnancy rate/slow cooling


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Parmegiani, G.E. Cognigni, S. Bernardi, W. Ciampaglia, F. Infante, P. Pocognoli, C. T. de Fatis, E. Troilo, and M. Filicori
Freezing within 2 h from oocyte retrieval increases the efficiency of human oocyte cryopreservation when using a slow freezing/rapid thawing protocol with high sucrose concentration
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1771 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. A. Gook and D. H. Edgar
Human oocyte cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 591 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. De Santis, G. Coticchio, S. Paynter, D. Albertini, K. Hutt, I. Cino, M. Iaccarino, A. Gambardella, C. Flamigni, and A. Borini
Permeability of human oocytes to ethylene glycol and their survival and spindle configurations after slow cooling cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2776 - 2783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Van den Abbeel, U. Schneider, J. Liu, Y. Agca, J. K Critser, and A. Van Steirteghem
Osmotic responses and tolerance limits to changes in external osmolalities, and oolemma permeability characteristics, of human in vitro matured MII oocytes
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1959 - 1972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.A. Nottola, G. Macchiarelli, G. Coticchio, S. Bianchi, S. Cecconi, L. De Santis, G. Scaravelli, C. Flamigni, and A. Borini
Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation using different sucrose concentrations
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1123 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Donnez, B. Martinez-Madrid, P. Jadoul, A. Van Langendonckt, D. Demylle, and M.-M. Dolmans
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 519 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Coticchio, L. De Santis, G. Rossi, A. Borini, D. Albertini, G. Scaravelli, C. Alecci, V. Bianchi, S. Nottola, and S. Cecconi
Sucrose concentration influences the rate of human oocytes with normal spindle and chromosome configurations after slow-cooling cryopreservation*
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1771 - 1776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Lee, L. R. Schover, A. H. Partridge, P. Patrizio, W. H. Wallace, K. Hagerty, L. N. Beck, L. V. Brennan, and K. Oktay
American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations on Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2917 - 2931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.