Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on January 20, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(4):1041-1046; doi:10.1093/humrep/dei424
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/4/1041    most recent
dei424v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Neubourg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Elseviers, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Neubourg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Elseviers, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies

D. De Neubourg1,3, J. Gerris1, K. Mangelschots1, E. Van Royen1, M. Vercruyssen1, A. Steylemans1 and M. Elseviers2

1 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef, Antwerp and 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein, Wilrijk, Belgium

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium. E-mail: diane.de.neubourg{at}skynet.be

BACKGROUND: Recently, concern has risen about poor obstetrical and neonatal outcome of singletons after IVF/ICSI. Because the population of patients receiving single-embryo transfer (SET) resulting in singleton pregnancies is different from the one that would have become pregnant (with a singleton) before SET was introduced, we wanted to investigate whether the outcome of singleton pregnancies after SET differed from spontaneously conceived singletons. METHODS: The obstetrical and early neonatal outcome of all pregnancies originating from SET after IVF/ICSI procedures between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2003, was prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 251 singleton pregnancies and births after SET were analyzed and compared to data from 59 535 spontaneously conceived singletons retrieved from the Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology. The mean birthweight of the singletons after SET was 3322 g (±538 SD) versus 3330 g (±531 SD) for the spontaneously conceived singletons (P = 0.82). The mean gestational age was 38.7 weeks (±1.9 SD) for SET and 38.9 weeks (±1.8 SD) for spontaneously conceived singletons (P = 0.06). The proportion of very preterm birth (<32 weeks) was 0.8% in each group, and the proportion of preterm birth (<37 weeks) was 10.0% for SET singletons and 6.24% for spontaneous singletons (P = 0.03). However, mean birthweight of very preterm, preterm and term SET singleton babies was similar to the mean birthweight in every category of gestational age in the spontaneous conceived control group. Stillbirth was 0.4% for both populations (P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Good prognosis patients, in whom SET is applied, do not only have a higher chance of conception but do not have an unfavourable outcome of their singleton baby when compared to spontaneous singletons.

Key words: obstetrical and neonatal outcome/single-embryo transfer/singletons after ART


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. M. Chambers, M. G. Chapman, N. Grayson, M. Shanahan, and E. A. Sullivan
Babies born after ART treatment cost more than non-ART babies: a cost analysis of inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3108 - 3115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Sheard, S. Cox, M. Oates, G. Ndukwe, and C. Glazebrook
Impact of a multiple, IVF birth on post-partum mental health: a composite analysis
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2058 - 2065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Poikkeus, M. Gissler, L. Unkila-Kallio, C. Hyden-Granskog, and A. Tiitinen
Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1073 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. De Sutter, I. Delbaere, J. Gerris, H. Verstraelen, S. Goetgeluk, J. Van der Elst, M. Temmerman, and M. Dhont
Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2633 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.