Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on April 10, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(8):2141-2148; doi:10.1093/humrep/del106
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
21/8/2141    most recent
del106v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arce, J.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Sørensen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arce, J.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Sørensen, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments

Joan-Carles Arce1,5, Søren Ziebe2, Kersti Lundin3, Ronny Janssens4, Lisbeth Helmgaard1 and Per Sørensen1

1 Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Clinical Research and Development, Copenhagen, Denmark 2 The Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark 3 Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden and 4 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academisch Ziekenhuis Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Research and Development, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Kay Fiskers Plads 11, Copenhagen S 2300, Denmark. E-mail: joan-carles.arce{at}ferring.com

BACKGROUND: The objective of this investigation was to determine the inter- and intraobserver agreement when assessing embryo quality. METHODS: This investigation included 4002 cleaved embryos from 7535 oocytes retrieved in 688 patients undergoing IVF cycles in a multicentre trial. Embryos were evaluated locally at the inverted microscope at 28, 44 and 68 h (±1 h) post-insemination. Digital images of the embryos were assessed centrally by three blinded embryologists. To assess reproducibility, 215 randomly selected cleaved embryos from 33 patients were re-evaluated by the three central embryologists. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement among the central embryologists (using the same method of evaluation; 2D images) was good for classification of top-quality embryos (kappa 0.71–0.73), excellent for classification of normally developed embryos (kappa 0.83–0.86) and good–excellent for classification of transferable embryos (kappa 0.78–0.82). The interobserver agreement between local and consolidated central assessment (different methods of evaluation, inverted microscopy versus 2D images) was good for all three embryo classifications (kappa 0.64–0.79). The intraobserver reproducibility for all three overall embryo classifications was excellent for the consolidated central assessment (kappa 0.80–0.91). CONCLUSION: Embryo quality can be determined with a good degree of interobserver agreement independently of the method of evaluation. Embryologists classify embryos with excellent intraobserver reproducibility.

Key words: agreement/embryo quality/interobserver/intraobserver/reproducibility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, R. Janssens, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the MERIT (Menotrophin vs Recombinant FSH in v
Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2404 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.