© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Letters to the editor |
On the benefit of assisted reproduction techniques, a comparison of the USA and Europe
1 IVF-Clinic, Sophiahemmet Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden 2 Fertilit Clinic 4071, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej, Copenhagen, Denmark 3 Departement of Ob/Gyn, Clinic Kempten/Oberallgau, Achademic Teaching Hospital, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany 4 Reproductive Medicin Unit, Bologna, Via Mazzini, Italy 5 INSERM U 569, Le Kremlin-Bicetre Cedex, France
6 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Sophiahemmet Hospital, IVF-Unit, Box 5605, S-11486 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: karl-gosta.nygren@telia.com
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Sir,
Gleicher et al. (2006)
, in their US versus Europe assisted reproduction techniques (ART) comparison of outcome data, find that large differences exist between the two. We recognize the importance of such comparison and analysis, which has the potential of defining the best approaches from different countries and regions, and if combined, this could help to improve the benefit of ART for the infertile
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Castilla, J. Hernandez, Y. Cabello, A. Lafuente, N. Pajuelo, J. Marqueta, B. Coroleu, and (Assisted Reproductive Technology Register of the Defining poor and optimum performance in an IVF programme Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 85 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gleicher, A. Weghofer, and D. Barad On the benefit of assisted reproduction techniques, a comparison of the USA and Europe Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 624 - 626. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
