Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on June 3, 2006
Human Reproduction 2006 21(9):2199-2200; doi:10.1093/humrep/del172
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
21/9/2199    most recent
del172v3
del172v2
del172v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jahn, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jahn, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

NEW DEBATE

Monitoring reproductive health in Europe—what are the best indicators of reproductive health?

Albrecht Jahn1, Kitty W.M. Bloemenkamp2, Philip Hannaford3, Jorn Olsen4,7, Miguel Oliveira da Silva5, Marleen Temmerman6 on behalf of the Reprostat Steering Committee

1 Department of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, Heidelberg, Germany 2 Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands 3 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK 4 Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA 5 Instituto de Medicina Preventiva, Lisbon Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal and 6 Department of Obstetrics-Gynaecology, University Hospital, Gent, Belgium

7 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA

Setting up goals to monitor if the goals are achieved and to compare health performance over time and between regions is part of modern health care. A key part in this process is to choose the right indicators. The indicators in reproductive health should be selected on the basis of relevance and validity. They should be simple and action oriented because monitoring for the sake of monitoring alone may do more harm than good. We invite comments from the readers of Human Reproduction on a set of indicators suggested by Reprostat.

Key words: health policy/monitoring/reproductive health


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.W. van der Pluijm, R.P.M.G. Hermens, C. Bergh, P. de Sutter, K.G. Nygren, A.M.M. Wetzels, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
The methodological quality of clinical guidelines of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1786 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
S.M. Mourad, R.P.M.G. Hermens, W.L.D.M. Nelen, D.D.M. Braat, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
Guideline-based development of quality indicators for subfertility care
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2665 - 2672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
W. H. James
Monitoring reproductive health in Europe: what are the best indicators?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1197 - 1199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G. Hermens, S.M. Mourad, E.C. Haagen, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
Monitoring reproductive health in Europe: what are the best indicators of reproductive health? A need for evidence-based quality indicators of reproductive health care
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 916 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.