Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on September 3, 2007
Human Reproduction 2007 22(11):3009-3012; doi:10.1093/humrep/dem274
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF )
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/11/3009    most recent
dem274v2
dem274v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Obel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hedegaard, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Obel, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hedegaard, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Psychological distress during early gestation and offspring sex ratio

Carsten Obel1,6, Tine Brink Henriksen2, Niels Jørgen Secher3, Brenda Eskenazi4 and Morten Hedegaard5

1 Department of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 2 Department of Paediatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark 4 School of Public Health University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

6 Correspondence address. Tel: +45-89426059; Fax: +45-86124788; E-mail: co{at}alm.au.dk

BACKGROUND: Exposure to severe stress in early pregnancy is associated with a lower male to female ratio (sex ratio), but whether more moderate levels of psychological discomfort have the same kind of effect is unknown. In a population based follow-up study, we aimed to test whether psychological distress was associated with the sex ratio in the offspring.

METHODS: From 1989 to 1992, a cohort of 8719 Danish-speaking pregnant women were followed until delivery. Questionnaires were administered to the women in early pregnancy and 6629 (76%) completed the 30-item version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ).

RESULTS: We found an overall male to female ratio (sex ratio) of 1.03. There was an inverse dose response association (test for trend P < 0.01) between GHQ score and sex ratio. Each 5-point increase in the GHQ score was associated with a decreasing odds of having a boy [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.98]. Mothers scoring in the upper quartile of the GHQ had 47% boys as compared with 52% in the undistressed groups (Risk difference =4.8%, 95% CI 1.9–7.7%) resulting in a significantly lower sex ratio of 0.85 compared with 1.07 (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.94).

CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that not only severe stress, but also more moderate and common levels of psychological distress, may decrease the sex ratio in the offspring. Stress during pregnancy is a likely candidate involved in the decreasing sex ratio observed in many countries.

Key words: psychological distress/stress/pregnancy/sex ratio/GHQ

Submitted on April 2, 2007; resubmitted on June 11, 2007; accepted on July 17, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Miliaras, S. Meditskou, and M. Ketikidou
Increased male proportion in fetal deaths and in fetuses with congenital malformations in Greece
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2385 - 2386.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.