Skip Navigation


Hum. Reprod. Advance Access originally published online on December 18, 2006
Human Reproduction 2007 22(3):885-894; doi:10.1093/humrep/del452
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/3/885    most recent
del452v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacob, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Greil, A.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacob, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Greil, A.L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Psychological distress by type of fertility barrier

Mary Casey Jacob1,4, J. McQuillan2 and A.L. Greil3

1 Departments of Psychiatry and Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA 2 Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA 3 Division of Social Sciences at Alfred University, Alfred, NY, USA

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Medical Dean's Office, University of Connecticut Health Centre, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030-1920. USA. Tel: +1 860 679 49 01; Fax: +1 860 679 1371; E-mail: jacob{at}nso1.uchc.edu

BACKGROUND: We examined fertility-specific distress (FSD) and general distress by type of fertility barrier (FB).

METHODS: In a random sample telephone survey, 580 US women reported their fertility intentions and histories. Six groups of women were identified: (i) no FBs, (ii) infertile with intent, (iii) infertile without intent, (iv) other fertility problems, (v) miscarriages and (vi) situational barriers. Multiple regression analyses were used to compare groups with FBs.

RESULTS: Sixty-one percent reported FBs and 28% reported an inability to conceive for at least 12 months. The infertile with intent group had the highest FSD, which was largely explained by (a) self-identification as infertile and (b) seeking medical help for fertility. The no FB group had a mean Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale score above the commonly used cut-off of 16, although 23% of the women with FBs did score above 16.

CONCLUSIONS: FBs are common. Self-identification as infertile is the largest source of FSD. More women with FBs had elevated general distress than women without FBs; mean general distress was below 16 for all FB groups. It may be that, for some women (even those with children), FBs can have lasting emotional consequences, but many women do heal from the emotional distress that may accompany fertility difficulties.

Key words: distress/infertility/survey

Submitted on January 5, 2006; resubmitted on September 15, 2006; resubmitted on September 26, 2006; resubmitted on October 19, 2006; accepted on October 25, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Lund, C.S. Sejbaek, U. Christensen, and L. Schmidt
The impact of social relations on the incidence of severe depressive symptoms among infertile women and men
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 2810 - 2820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.